Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:30:27 +0100 From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BSD, .Net comments - any reponse to this reasoning? Message-ID: <20010710173027.A53776@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20010710175800.A77023@FreeBSD.org>; from eivind@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 05:58:00PM %2B0200 References: <20010630174743.A85268@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010707160255.A18525@thinksec.no> <20010710151059.A52201@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010710175800.A77023@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
| - The CAM code in FreeBSD, developed by Plutotech for their embedded video | editing system and contributed back. This is the present basis for the | FreeBSD SCSI subsystem. I had heard FreeBSD has been used in some video post-production software, but it doesn't seem to get much publicity. I wonder why not? And why can't BSD be used as a platform for a really good audio editing application, like CakeWalk is for Win32? | - The original PnP support for the ed driver, developed by Yours Truly for Yes | interactive and donated back to FreeBSD. This also contained a simple but So these companies don't care that after paying a consultant to do the work, the result is effectively given away? Or do they just want a solution for a problem, and don't care about the code itself? Jonathon -- Microsoft complaining about the source license used by Linux is like the event horizon calling the kettle black. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010710173027.A53776>