Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:44:23 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: ru@FreeBSD.org Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/config main.c Message-ID: <20050426.174423.78702631.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050425151203.GA43724@ip.net.ua> References: <20050425050656.GA42466@ip.net.ua> <20050425143043.GA93171@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050425151203.GA43724@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20050425151203.GA43724@ip.net.ua>
Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:30:43AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
: > If 'make depend' isn't 100% garenteed to work, we should make sure it
: > 100% works.
: >
: I have a patch in the works that should solve this. I hope to post it
: later today (local time) for review.
I'd love to see it.
: > > If you need automation, use "make buildkernel", or stop using NO_CLEAN.
: >
: > I didn't use 'NO_CLEAN' for the kernel build, yet you keep bringing up
: > that I am.
: >
: You don't listen then. Yes you didn't use the NO_CLEAN, but when you
: do "config FOO; cd ../compile/FOO; make depend; make" you effectively
: do NOT run "make clean" or "make cleandepend", that's why I keep
: saying NO_CLEAN. If you have used "make buildkernel" without NO_CLEAN
: you wouldn't have ran into this problem.
:
: In the above, NO_CLEAN means that NO "make clean" (or at a minimum
: "make cleandepend") was run.
I can say that confused me as well...
Since we're starting to churn a bit here, it might make sense to get a
little more review before the next set of patches go in.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050426.174423.78702631.imp>