Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 18:03:39 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>, Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c src/sy Message-ID: <20000617010339.896181CDF@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Message from "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> of "Sat, 17 Jun 2000 04:06:05 %2B0900." <394A7A9D.5A354553@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >
> > > The correct here is find _why_ there is a performance impact if this
> > > delay accept feature is not used, and fix _that_ instead.
> >
> > Well, my naivity abounds, but I would have thought it was because you do an
> > accept() which returns and then immediatly you go back to waiting on select
().
>
> Use kqueue then.
How? Put an application specific protocol filter into the kernel so that
kqueue can wait on it?
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000617010339.896181CDF>