Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:11:01 +0400 From: Andrey Zonov <andrey@zonov.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r232321 - head/share/man/man9 Message-ID: <CANU_PUG3w_7ZJPDw=OqiYWgSuoYmD3JrObjaFX3p4n-a6Zqyhw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4F450D.3060607@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202292241.q1TMffCk048359@svn.freebsd.org> <4F4F2375.3080209@zonov.org> <4F4F3BFB.5030104@FreeBSD.org> <CANU_PUHCvk6U25A7kUi=NJ5mRvZDJBkLbFxaCeo3ueEXOfT3fQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F4F450D.3060607@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > on 01/03/2012 11:11 Andrey Zonov said the following: >> It doesn't make sense. =A0For (CTLFLAG_RD|CTLFLAG_TUN) there is relevant >> code in sysctl(8), but for (CTLFLAG_RW|CTLFLAG_TUN) there is no any >> code, or did I miss something? > > In the existing code - no. > But I would appreciate if e.g. sysctl -d could report that a sysctl also = has a > twin tunable. =A0I can imagine that there could be things which are bette= r be set > to a certain value from the very start (via a tunable) rather than switch= ed to > that value later in a boot process (via sysctl). > Extra user-friendly information doesn't hurt, IMO. That would be very usefull, I also thought of it, but for now we've got many tunables+sysctls that don't mark as CTLFLAG_TUN. One quick example is: vm.pmap.shpgperproc --=20 Andrey Zonov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANU_PUG3w_7ZJPDw=OqiYWgSuoYmD3JrObjaFX3p4n-a6Zqyhw>