Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 22:57:56 +0300 From: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net> To: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, Claude Buisson <clbuisson@orange.fr> Cc: emaste@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFT vidcontrol for vt(4) Message-ID: <73450c57-bbfe-4b17-b43b-f9ae8bc8f951@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <5370E800.8040803@freebsd.org> References: <20140311162743.072870a9afd4f74fff9e99e8@ddteam.net> <5370CE34.8000905@orange.fr> <20140512171415.558dbcb68971d1db675ea39e@ddteam.net> <5370E47E.7030304@orange.fr> <5370E800.8040803@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 травня 2014 р. 18:25:52 GMT+03:00, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> wrote: >On 05/12/14 08:10, Claude Buisson wrote: >>>> >>>> What I have to do to get scrolling on every ttyvN ? >>>> >>>> The only way to get the system working in normal VGA mode (640x480) > >>>> (not loading >>>> the drm2 and radeon kms modules by loader.conf) is by configuring >>>> the BIOS to >>>> not do display expansion - which leads to the same ridiculously >>>> small font.. >>>> >>>> And of course, kbdmux keeps being mandatory to be able to load a >>>> keymap. >>> >>> Yeah, I still remember. :) >>> >> >> This could be noted in the newly born vt(4) man page .. > >Is there any reason not to have kbdmux be mandatory at this point? >Having it be non-optional would simplify a lot of code and most of the >code for the non-kbdmux case is heavily bitrotten at this point (see >here). >-Nathan Looks like we should just add vt as of dependency to kbdmux. Thanks. WBW ------ Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?73450c57-bbfe-4b17-b43b-f9ae8bc8f951>