Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:22:17 -0600 (MDT) From: <janb@cs.utep.edu> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <daniel.sobral@tcoip.com.br> Cc: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>, Marek Gorka <marek.gorka@tpi.pl>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3 and 6G RAM Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0107201921460.3652-100000@gecko> In-Reply-To: <3B589107.2030609@tcoip.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Even, when there is not more than 4BG RAM? Should a facility such as this not be disabled when not in use? JAn On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > janb@cs.utep.edu wrote: > > > I am interestied as to why this is. Is there a sound technical reason do > > not support this, or was it merely the fact that there are not too many > > machines that can take advantage of this anyway, and nobody got around to > > do this? > > > Yes, there is a good reason. It reduces overall performance. > > > -- > Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) > Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br > dcs@newsguy.com > dcs@freebsd.org > capo@notorious.bsdconspiracy.net > > Talking much about oneself can also be a means to conceal oneself. > -- Friedrich Nietzsche > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.30.0107201921460.3652-100000>