Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:12:33 +0800 From: Buganini <buganini@gmail.com> To: Gavin Atkinson <gavin@freebsd.org> Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: graid hit the tree Message-ID: <BANLkTikFCvtDi53aUEjQchYz0_LQ45CYXg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1308316186.45314.21.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> References: <4D8BBC29.6040500@FreeBSD.org> <1308316186.45314.21.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/6/17 Gavin Atkinson <gavin@freebsd.org>:
> Is there any chance that mapping from /dev/arX -> /dev/raid/r0 etc could
> also be done?
so this is lying yet?
UPDATING
20110424:
ataraid(4) functionality is now supported by the RAID GEOM class.
To use it you can load geom_raid kernel module and use graid(8) tool
for management. Instead of /dev/arX device names, use /dev/raid/rX.
BTW,
amr controllers seem not hiding real device, I got somethings like
ar0, ad4, ad6 in ATA era.
For solving device name issue, usually I use label,
but the unhided device make label duplicated,
anyway to tune it?
Thanks,
Buganini
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikFCvtDi53aUEjQchYz0_LQ45CYXg>