Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:14:33 +0300 From: "Penerdzhy R.V." <prv0@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 10 Message-ID: <1698330100.20050303151433@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050303120042.DA99616A579@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050303120042.DA99616A579@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Здравствуйте, freebsd-stable-request. Вы писали 3 марта 2005 г., 15:00:42: fsrfo> Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to fsrfo> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit fsrfo> fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable fsrfo> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fsrfo> freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org fsrfo> You can reach the person managing the list at fsrfo> freebsd-stable-owner@freebsd.org fsrfo> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific fsrfo> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest..." fsrfo> Today's Topics: fsrfo> 1. Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 9 (Penerdzhy R.V.) fsrfo> 2. Re: {Spam?} Re: can't get a crash dump (Roberto Nunnari) fsrfo> 3. Re: Linking with CUPS Issue (Jake Stride) fsrfo> 4. Re: Linking with CUPS Issue (Jake Stride) fsrfo> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- fsrfo> Message: 1 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:28:58 +0300 fsrfo> From: "Penerdzhy R.V." <prv0@yandex.ru> fsrfo> Subject: Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 9 fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <1914821434.20050303142858@yandex.ru> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 fsrfo> Здравствуйте, freebsd-stable-request. fsrfo> Вы писали 3 марта 2005 г., 14:20:03: fsrfo>> Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to fsrfo>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit fsrfo>> fsrfo>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable fsrfo>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fsrfo>> freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org fsrfo>> You can reach the person managing the list at fsrfo>> freebsd-stable-owner@freebsd.org fsrfo>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific fsrfo>> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest..." fsrfo>> Today's Topics: fsrfo>> 1. Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 8 (Penerdzhy R.V.) fsrfo>> 2. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 (Artem Kuchin) fsrfo>> 3. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 (Gerald de la Pascua) fsrfo>> 4. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 (Artem Kuchin) fsrfo>> 5. 1000baseTX? (Yoshiaki Kasahara) fsrfo>> 6. Linking with CUPS Issue (Jake Stride) fsrfo>> 7. Re: Dual booting with Windows XP (Jared Earle) fsrfo>> 8. Need Help With mount_smbfs Error Message (Tim Daneliuk) fsrfo>> 9. Re: Linking with CUPS Issue (Michael C. Shultz) fsrfo>> 10. 4.11-RELEASE panics (Kirill Ponomarew) fsrfo>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- fsrfo>> Message: 1 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:16:35 +0300 fsrfo>> From: "Penerdzhy R.V." <prv0@yandex.ru> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 8 fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <1576425481.20050303111635@yandex.ru> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 fsrfo>> Здравствуйте, freebsd-stable-request. fsrfo>> Вы писали 3 марта 2005 г., 11:09:56: fsrfo>>> Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to fsrfo>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit fsrfo>>> fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable fsrfo>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fsrfo>>> freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> You can reach the person managing the list at fsrfo>>> freebsd-stable-owner@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific fsrfo>>> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest..." fsrfo>>> Today's Topics: fsrfo>>> 1. Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for FreebBSD fsrfo>>> 4.10 (Artem Kuchin) fsrfo>>> 2. Re: Can FreeBSD be installed on fsrfo>>> DellPowerEdge2800 ? (Art Mason) fsrfo>>> 3. 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Thomas Krause) fsrfo>>> 4. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Scot Hetzel) fsrfo>>> 5. Re: "ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted" from "boot0cfg fsrfo>>> -s 1" (Doug Ambrisko) fsrfo>>> 6. Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 (M. Warner Losh) fsrfo>>> 7. Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 (M. Warner Losh) fsrfo>>> 8. Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 (M. Warner Losh) fsrfo>>> 9. Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 (Ruslan Ermilov) fsrfo>>> 10. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Colin Percival) fsrfo>>> 11. Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo>>> (Freddie Cash) fsrfo>>> 12. ueagle(4) driver merging (Mateusz J?drasik) fsrfo>>> 13. Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo>>> (Peter Jeremy) fsrfo>>> 14. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Brian Behlendorf) fsrfo>>> 15. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Kevin Oberman) fsrfo>>> 16. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Kevin Oberman) fsrfo>>> 17. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Daniel Eischen) fsrfo>>> 18. Re: ueagle(4) driver merging (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo>>> 19. Re: ueagle(4) driver merging (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo>>> 20. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Brian Behlendorf) fsrfo>>> 21. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Daniel Eischen) fsrfo>>> 22. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Pete French) fsrfo>>> 23. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Eric Schuele) fsrfo>>> 24. Dual booting with Windows XP (Didier Caamano) fsrfo>>> 25. 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) (Edwin Brown) fsrfo>>> 26. Re: Crash when PREEMPTION enabled (Kris Kennaway) fsrfo>>> 27. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>>> (Michael C. Shultz) fsrfo>>> 28. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>>> (Edwin Brown) fsrfo>>> 29. ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila) fsrfo>>> 30. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>>> (Edwin Brown) fsrfo>>> 31. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>>> (Michael C. Shultz) fsrfo>>> 32. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo>>> FreebBSD 4.10 (pete wright) fsrfo>>> 33. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo>>> 34. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo>>> 35. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila) fsrfo>>> 36. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (pcasidy@casidy.com) fsrfo>>> 37. -PRErelease and ACPI: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA (Emanuel Strobl) fsrfo>>> 38. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo>>> 39. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila) fsrfo>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- fsrfo>>> Message: 1 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300 fsrfo>>> From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo>>> Subject: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for FreebBSD fsrfo>>> 4.10 fsrfo>>> To: "FreeBSD Stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <024601c51f33$eda69e40$0c00a8c0@artem> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; fsrfo>>> reply-type=original fsrfo>>> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2) fsrfo>>> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ? fsrfo>>> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE fsrfo>>> driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure). fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Regards, fsrfo>>> Artem Kuchin fsrfo>>> IT Legion Ltd. fsrfo>>> Moscow, Russia fsrfo>>> www.itlegion.ru fsrfo>>> matrix@itlegion.ru fsrfo>>> +7 095 232-0338 fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 2 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:25:40 -0600 fsrfo>>> From: Art Mason <amason@rackspace.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ? fsrfo>>> To: Vinny Abello <vinny@tellurian.com> fsrfo>>> Cc: Kipp Holger <h.kipp@eurowings.com> fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <4225CCE4.3080304@rackspace.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>>> Yeah, I cam across that on some mailing list archives, but saw some fsrfo>>> additional references that this can cause issues with the amr driver. fsrfo>>> Have you experienced any instability issues with the amr driver and PAE fsrfo>>> enabled? If not, then I'll give this a shot on one of our lab boxes for fsrfo>>> testing. Thanks for the suggestion, BTW. fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Art Mason fsrfo>>> Technical Support - Team F fsrfo>>> Rackspace Managed Hosting fsrfo>>> (800) 961-4454 ext. 4290 fsrfo>>> amason@rackspace.com fsrfo>>> Vinny Abello wrote: >>>> FYI, the architecture of the 2850 (assuming it is similar to your 2800) >>>> requires that you enable PAE support in your kernel of whatever OS you >>>> run to address the full 4GB of RAM. This is due in some part because of >>>> the memory mapping that was done for the PCI express bus and/or onboard >>>> Perc controller (per Dell tech support). We've run into this with all of >>>> our 2850's with various OS's and enabling PAE (per Dell's advice) fixes it. >>>> >>>> At 05:50 PM 3/1/2005, Art Mason wrote: >>>> >>>>> Indeed, just installed on a customer's server last night, and I build >>>>> SMP support into the GENERIC kernel this morning. Only issues I >>>>> encountered has to do w/ recognizing the full 4GB of RAM, but this >>>>> apparently has some compatibility issues w/ the amr driver. >>>>> As per Holger's comments about disabling USB in BIOS, this is a good >>>>> suggestion, since the DRAC apparently causes some IRQ issues w/ the >>>>> PS/2 keyboard controller, or something along those lines. Regardless, >>>>> these 2850 boxes are stupid fast, and I'm looking forward to >>>>> benchmarking 5.3 on them. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Art Mason >>>>> Technical Support - Team F >>>>> Rackspace Managed Hosting >>>>> (800) 961-4454 ext. 4290 >>>>> amason@rackspace.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kipp Holger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue 01.03.2005 17:49, lhmwzy wrote: >>>>>> Please reply to hk at alogis dot com. This is not my native >>>>>> account. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes >>>>>> >>>>>>> Anybody did this? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Any help is appreciateed? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Boot from FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-CD and install. No problems >>>>>> so far. You might want to disable USB within BIOS, though, >>>>>> because they seem to be shared with other critical devices >>>>>> (nics and raidcontroller). But I don't use USB anyway. >>>>>> Then you might want to upgrade to 5-STABLE. >>>>>> This is on Dell PowerEdge 2800 with 2GB ECC RAM, >>>>>> 4 x 36GB SCSI and amrd-Controller (PERC-4-something). >>>>>> Binary copy of SAP 4.6C and Oracle 8 (from a working >>>>>> installation on FreeBSD 4.x) works nearly without changes >>>>>> (using emulators/linux_base-suse-9.1 and one additional >>>>>> rpm (some compatibility-thing)). >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Holger Kipp >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Vinny Abello >>>> Network Engineer >>>> Server Management >>>> vinny@tellurian.com >>>> (973)300-9211 x 125 >>>> (973)940-6125 (Direct) >>>> PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0 E935 5325 FBCB 0100 977A >>>> >>>> Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection >>>> http://www.tellurian.com (888)TELLURIAN >>>> >>>> "Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear" >>>> -- Mark Twain >>>> >>>> >>>> fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 3 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET) fsrfo>>> From: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo>>> Subject: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: fsrfo>>> <2481.212.78.101.51.1109776024.squirrel@mta.webmatic.de> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 fsrfo>>> Hello, fsrfo>>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: fsrfo>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp fsrfo>>> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd fsrfo>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift fsrfo>>> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd fsrfo>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift fsrfo>>> gate:/ # ntpq ntpq>>>> peers fsrfo>>> No association ID's returned fsrfo>>> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine: fsrfo>>> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart fsrfo>>> Stopping ntpd. fsrfo>>> Starting ntpd. fsrfo>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp fsrfo>>> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd fsrfo>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift fsrfo>>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. fsrfo>>> Kind regards, fsrfo>>> Thomas. fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 4 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:53:59 -0600 fsrfo>>> From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo>>> To: Thomas Krause <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <790a9fff05030207536d59cb17@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET), Thomas Krause fsrfo>>> <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >>>> >>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >>>> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>>> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>>> >>>> gate:/ # ntpq >>>> ntpq> peers >>>> No association ID's returned >>>> >>>> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine: >>>> >>>> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart >>>> Stopping ntpd. >>>> Starting ntpd. >>>> >>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >>>> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>>> >>>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. >>>> fsrfo>>> It could be that you have 2 scripts that are starting ntpd, check your fsrfo>>> rc.d directories: fsrfo>>> grep ntp /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* fsrfo>>> Scot fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 5 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:09:22 -0800 (PST) fsrfo>>> From: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: "ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted" from "boot0cfg fsrfo>>> -s 1" fsrfo>>> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> fsrfo>>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503021609.j22G9MN3041308@ambrisko.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>>> David Wolfskill writes: fsrfo>>> | freebeast(5.4-P)[1] sudo boot0cfg -s 1 -v ad0 fsrfo>>> | Password: fsrfo>>> | boot0cfg: /dev/ad0: ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted fsrfo>>> | freebeast(5.4-P)[2] fsrfo>>> You might try: fsrfo>>> sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16 fsrfo>>> Doug A. fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 6 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:13:22 -0700 (MST) fsrfo>>> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 fsrfo>>> To: veldy@veldy.net fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302.091322.112684861.imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>>> In message: <421DE027.70204@veldy.net> fsrfo>>> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> writes: fsrfo>>> : Right away ... first thing! fsrfo>>> : fsrfo>>> : fsrfo>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- : >>>>>> Installing everything fsrfo>>> : fsrfo>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- fsrfo>>> : cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install : ===>>>> share/info fsrfo>>> : install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir : ===>>>> include fsrfo>>> : creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh fsrfo>>> : touch: not found fsrfo>>> You have one of the canonical problems: fsrfo>>> (1) Time skew between building machine and installing machine fsrfo>>> (2) The path to the sources isn't exactly fsrfo>>> identical, in its canonical fsrfo>>> form, between building machine and installing machine fsrfo>>> (3) MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is different between building and installing. fsrfo>>> Warner fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 7 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:14:15 -0700 (MST) fsrfo>>> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 fsrfo>>> To: sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302.091415.101560664.imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>>> In message: <20050224145622.GE261@cowbert.2y.net> fsrfo>>> "Peter C. Lai" <sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net> writes: fsrfo>>> : Is there a way to build kernel modules by fsrfo>>> themselves without having to fsrfo>>> : build the entire kernel? I am adding umass fsrfo>>> support to a 4.x machine but fsrfo>>> : I don't want to build the entire kernel. I fsrfo>>> already have scbus, but I need fsrfo>>> : da and of course, umass. fsrfo>>> cd src/sys/modules/umass ; make all install clean fsrfo>>> This assumes that the sources match what's on the system. fsrfo>>> Warner fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 8 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:15:16 -0700 (MST) fsrfo>>> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 fsrfo>>> To: sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net fsrfo>>> Cc: swhetzel@gmail.com fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302.091516.51358208.imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>>> In message: <20050224161305.GG261@cowbert.2y.net> fsrfo>>> "Peter C. Lai" <sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net> writes: fsrfo>>> : On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: : >>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:56:22 -0500, Peter C. Lai : >>>> <sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net> wrote: : >>>> > Is there a way to build kernel modules by themselves without having to : >>>> > build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but : >>>> > I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need : >>>> > da and of course, umass. : >>>> > : >>>> : >>>> Yes you can build modules seperately from a kernel build : >>>> : >>>> cd /usr/src/sys/modules/umass : >>>> make obj : >>>> make : >>>> make install : >>>> : >>>> Scot fsrfo>>> : fsrfo>>> : ok. what about da? i don't have that in my fsrfo>>> kernel, even though i have scbus. fsrfo>>> : I think i'm just going to recompile the entire kernel anyway; I was just fsrfo>>> : trying to not have to back-cvs /usr/src to patch the current one I have fsrfo>>> : installed. (the more basic problem is i really fsrfo>>> should be keeping multiple fsrfo>>> : versions of /usr/src around for different fsrfo>>> versions on different machines, fsrfo>>> : but that is a separate problem). fsrfo>>> modules/cam is what you want. Hmmm, looks like you have part of it in fsrfo>>> your kernel already, so you'll not be able to do what you want. fsrfo>>> Warner fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 9 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:56:45 +0200 fsrfo>>> From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 fsrfo>>> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>>> Cc: veldy@veldy.net fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302165645.GB49216@ip.net.ua> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" fsrfo>>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 09:13:22AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: >>>> In message: <421DE027.70204@veldy.net> >>>> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> writes: >>>> : Right away ... first thing! >>>> : >>>> : -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> : >>> Installing everything >>>> : -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> : cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install >>>> : ===> share/info >>>> : install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir >>>> : ===> include >>>> : creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh >>>> : touch: not found >>>> >>>> You have one of the canonical problems: >>>> >>>> (1) Time skew between building machine and installing machine >>>> (2) The path to the sources isn't exactly identical, in its canonical >>>> form, between building machine and installing machine >>>> (3) MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is different between building and installing. >>>> fsrfo>>> Besides, for NFS installs (by mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj and doing fsrfo>>> install) to work at all, the following conditions all must be met: fsrfo>>> 1) Architecture on both machines should be the same, fsrfo>>> 2) CPUs on both machines should be compatible [*], fsrfo>>> 3) FreeBSD versions should be IDENTICAL, fsrfo>>> 4) The contents of /etc/make.conf should be compatible. fsrfo>>> [*] Or the world on the build machine should be built with CFLAGS fsrfo>>> compatible with the CPU on the install machine. fsrfo>>> Cheers, fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Ruslan Ermilov fsrfo>>> ru@FreeBSD.org fsrfo>>> FreeBSD committer fsrfo>>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>>> Name: not available fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>>> Desc: not available fsrfo>>> Url : fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050302/434f456b/attachment-0001.bin fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 10 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:15:18 +0000 fsrfo>>> From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo>>> To: Thomas Krause <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <4225F4A6.8010200@freebsd.org> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 fsrfo>>> Thomas Krause wrote: >>>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >>>> [...] >>>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. fsrfo>>> 1. You have some host names in ntp.conf which need to be resolved, and fsrfo>>> 2. At the time ntpd starts, the resolver isn't running. fsrfo>>> For some reason, ntpd makes one attempt to look up names in DNS and then fsrfo>>> goes into an infinite loop. fsrfo>>> Colin Percival fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 11 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:20:42 -0800 fsrfo>>> From: Freddie Cash <fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503020920.43155.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo>>> On March 2, 2005 02:46 am, Rob wrote: >>>> In /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is the list of supported >>>> sound devices. I get confused by the pressence and >>>> absence of quotes here. Are these quotes only >>>> decoration, or really needed. For example: >>>> device "snd_ad1816" >>>> device snd_cmi >>>> If they are needed, it confuses me why one sound >>>> device needs quotes, and another doesn't? fsrfo>>> You have to put quotes around any device names with numbers in them. If fsrfo>>> you don't, the kernel config will error out. >>>> How does that affect the use of loading them in >>>> /boot/loader.conf? How about following two: fsrfo>>> It doesn't affect loader.conf. You only put quotes around the value of fsrfo>>> the variable ("YES" or "NO") not around the variable names. >>>> snd_ad1816_load="YES" >>>> snd_cmi_load="YES" >>>> Is that OK? fsrfo>>> Yes. fsrfo>>> However, if you add the devices to the kernel config file, you don't fsrfo>>> need to add them to loader.conf. loader.conf is used to load kernel fsrfo>>> modules. You need to decide whether to compile all devices into the fsrfo>>> kernel, or load some as kernel modules. fsrfo>>> Personally, I like to put devices that won't change (like USB, ATA, SMB, fsrfo>>> etc) into the kernel config file. And load devices that will change fsrfo>>> (like NICs, soundcards, etc) as modules via loader.conf. Saves time fsrfo>>> and effort when I decide to swap out NICs and test soundcards and fsrfo>>> similar. fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Freddie Cash, CCNT CCLP Helpdesk / Network Support Tech. fsrfo>>> School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357] fsrfo>>> fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 12 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:55:23 +0100 fsrfo>>> From: Mateusz J?drasik<imachine@toya.net.pl> fsrfo>>> Subject: ueagle(4) driver merging fsrfo>>> To: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <4225FE0B.1000604@toya.net.pl> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed fsrfo>>> Hi, fsrfo>>> I wonder how is the FreeBSD team looking on the driver ueagle written by fsrfo>>> one Damien Bergamini. It is a ADSL modem driver which connects using fsrfo>>> USB, a quite popular solution in Poland, and France as well, aparently. fsrfo>>> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem fsrfo>>> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver? fsrfo>>> I would really like to see such a driver supported inside of the FreeBSD fsrfo>>> system itself since it would make me feel much more comfortable using a fsrfo>>> somewhat FreeBSD oficially supported code than third party patching. fsrfo>>> Here follows some more information regarding the project: fsrfo>>> http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ueagle/index.html fsrfo>>> Cheers, fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Mateusz Jкdrasik <imachine@toya.net.pl> fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 13 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 05:51:36 +1100 fsrfo>>> From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo>>> To: Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> fsrfo>>> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302185136.GA2302@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2005-Mar-02 02:46:41 -0800, Rob wrote: >>>>In /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is the list of supported >>>>sound devices. I get confused by the pressence and >>>>absence of quotes here. Are these quotes only >>>>decoration, or really needed. For example: >>>> >>>>device "snd_ad1816" >>>>device snd_cmi >>>> >>>>If they are needed, it confuses me why one sound >>>>device needs quotes, and another doesn't? fsrfo>>> For hysterical raisins, config(8) parses bareword arguments to "device" as fsrfo>>> <perl> fsrfo>>> ($device_name, $device_instance) = /([a-zA-Z_]+)([0-9]*)/; fsrfo>>> </perl> fsrfo>>> The double quotes force the first entry to be treated as a device fsrfo>>> "snd_ad1816", rather than the 1817th instance of "snd_ad". >>>>How does that affect the use of loading them in >>>>/boot/loader.conf? How about following two: >>>> >>>>snd_ad1816_load="YES" >>>>snd_cmi_load="YES" >>>> >>>>Is that OK? fsrfo>>> Yes. The loader has a different parsing algorithm: fsrfo>>> ${device_name}_load="{YES,NO}" fsrfo>>> and fsrfo>>> hint.$device_name.$device_instance.flag="VALUE" fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Peter Jeremy fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 14 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:06:27 -0800 (PST) fsrfo>>> From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>>> To: Ruben van Staveren <ruben@verweg.com> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302150553.N84651@paz.hyperreal.org> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:23:42AM +0200, Ege Mukan wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nowavadays whenever I want to surf on websites which contains flash >>>>> things my firefox or mozilla shuts itself. >>>>> >>>>> Did you ever encounter this problem. And if you'd how did you eliminate ??? >>>> >>>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >>>> >>>> (as in >>>> >>>> Section "Extensions" >>>> Option "Composite" "Enable" >>>> EndSection >>>> >>>> ) >>>> >>>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh >>>> >>>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 fsrfo>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and fsrfo>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. fsrfo>>> Brian fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 15 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:07:55 -0800 fsrfo>>> From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo>>> To: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302230755.7A0F05D07@ptavv.es.net> >>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET) >>>> From: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> >>>> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >>>> >>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >>>> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>>> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>>> >>>> gate:/ # ntpq >>>> ntpq> peers >>>> No association ID's returned >>>> >>>> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine: >>>> >>>> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart >>>> Stopping ntpd. >>>> Starting ntpd. >>>> >>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >>>> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>>> >>>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. fsrfo>>> Either you have two commands to start ntpd in fsrfo>>> /etc/rc.d or (more likely) fsrfo>>> the parent process is never exiting. When ntpd starts, it forks a child fsrfo>>> process (the daemon) and exits. I have seen cases where the parent fsrfo>>> process never exits because the child never properly starts. fsrfo>>> That said, I have never seen this happen on a FreeBSD system, so it may fsrfo>>> be that you are starting it twice. But this seems a bit unlikely as the fsrfo>>> second daemon should exit immediately because the network socket is fsrfo>>> already in use. But it's possible that they are stating so close fsrfo>>> together that a race condition is locking things up. (Just speculation.) fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer fsrfo>>> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) fsrfo>>> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) fsrfo>>> E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 16 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:11:23 -0800 fsrfo>>> From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo>>> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302231123.D14555D07@ptavv.es.net> >>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:15:18 +0000 >>>> From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> >>>> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >>>> >>>> Thomas Krause wrote: >>>> > when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >>>> > [...] >>>> > Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. >>>> >>>> 1. You have some host names in ntp.conf which need to be resolved, and >>>> 2. At the time ntpd starts, the resolver isn't running. >>>> >>>> For some reason, ntpd makes one attempt to look up names in DNS and then >>>> goes into an infinite loop. fsrfo>>> Good idea. Yes, the DNS resolution in ntpd is really, really stupid. I fsrfo>>> always specify addresses in ntp.conf for this reason and the fact that fsrfo>>> it there are multiple addresses only the first returned will be fsrfo>>> tried. It never fails over if that one is dead. (And, should an IPv6 fsrfo>>> address be available on a system that does not have IPv6 fsrfo>>> connectivity...). fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer fsrfo>>> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) fsrfo>>> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) fsrfo>>> E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 17 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:56:36 -0500 (EST) fsrfo>>> From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>>> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: fsrfo>>> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0503021855350.28715-100000@sea.ntplx.net> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >>>> > >>>> > (as in >>>> > >>>> > Section "Extensions" >>>> > Option "Composite" "Enable" >>>> > EndSection >>>> > >>>> > ) >>>> > >>>> > Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh >>>> > >>>> > export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 >>>> >>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and >>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. fsrfo>>> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace fsrfo>>> out of it? fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> DE fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 18 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:43:43 +1030 fsrfo>>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ueagle(4) driver merging fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503031043.52675.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" fsrfo>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:25, Mateusz Jкdrasik wrote: >>>> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem >>>> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver? fsrfo>>> umodem is for serial modems not ADSL. I believe ADSL modems tend to send fsrfo>>> either ATM or ethernet frames whereas umodem deals with RS232 like devices. fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo>>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo>>> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo>>> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo>>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo>>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo>>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>>> Name: not available fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>>> Desc: not available fsrfo>>> Url : fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/abd25763/attachment-0002.bin fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 19 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:43:43 +1030 fsrfo>>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ueagle(4) driver merging fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503031043.52675.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" fsrfo>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:25, Mateusz Jкdrasik wrote: >>>> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem >>>> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver? fsrfo>>> umodem is for serial modems not ADSL. I believe ADSL modems tend to send fsrfo>>> either ATM or ethernet frames whereas umodem deals with RS232 like devices. fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo>>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo>>> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo>>> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo>>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo>>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo>>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>>> Name: not available fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>>> Desc: not available fsrfo>>> Url : fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/abd25763/attachment-0003.bin fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 20 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:16:22 -0800 (PST) fsrfo>>> From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302161410.X84651@paz.hyperreal.org> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >>>>>> >>>>>> (as in >>>>>> >>>>>> Section "Extensions" >>>>>> Option "Composite" "Enable" >>>>>> EndSection >>>>>> >>>>>> ) >>>>>> >>>>>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh >>>>>> >>>>>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 >>>>> >>>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and >>>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. >>>> >>>> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace >>>> out of it? fsrfo>>> Because, as I said earlier this thread: fsrfo>>> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it fsrfo>>> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I fsrfo>>> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I fsrfo>>> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone fsrfo>>> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day fsrfo>>> lighten up and let Mozilla fsrfo>>> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something. fsrfo>>> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a fsrfo>>> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response to fsrfo>>> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom fsrfo>>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? fsrfo>>> Brian fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 21 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:31:36 -0500 (EST) fsrfo>>> From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>>> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: fsrfo>>> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0503021926300.28715-100000@sea.ntplx.net> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace >>>> > out of it? >>>> >>>> Because, as I said earlier this thread: >>>> >>>> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it >>>> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I >>>> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I >>>> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone >>>> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla >>>> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something. >>>> >>>> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a >>>> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response to >>>> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom >>>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? fsrfo>>> Is it that hard to type 'firefox -g', alias firefox="firefox -g", or fsrfo>>> whatever, and use it that way for a few days to see if you can fsrfo>>> get a trace? I'm just wondering if it has the same problem fsrfo>>> as linuxpluginwrapper, or bad assumptions about mutexes fsrfo>>> being recursive or unlocking one you don't own. fsrfo>>> Most folks I know use the linuxpluginwrapper so we don't have fsrfo>>> any experience with the native flash player. I think I recall fsrfo>>> trying it and it not working, hence the use of linuxpluginwrapper. fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> DE fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 22 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:54:23 +0000 fsrfo>>> From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>>> To: brian@hyperreal.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <E1D6ebf-000Dcm-Ut@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> >>>> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom >>>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? fsrfo>>> No, it doesnt work for me either - but I dont care enough about fsrfo>>> websites with mflash to bother looking into it. fsrfo>>> -pcf. fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 23 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:22:58 -0600 fsrfo>>> From: Eric Schuele <e.schuele@computer.org> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>>> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <42269122.7000505@computer.org> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>>> Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (as in >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Section "Extensions" >>>>>>> Option "Composite" "Enable" >>>>>>> EndSection >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! >>>>>>> /bin/sh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and >>>>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace >>>>> out of it? >>>> >>>> >>>> Because, as I said earlier this thread: >>>> >>>> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it >>>> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I >>>> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I >>>> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone >>>> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla >>>> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something. >>>> >>>> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a >>>> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response >>>> to Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom >>>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? >>>> fsrfo>>> Fails for me too. On all flash sites near as I can tell. fsrfo>>> -Eric >>>> Brian >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Regards, fsrfo>>> Eric fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 24 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:40:28 -0700 fsrfo>>> From: Didier Caamano <nemesisdivina@gennux.ca> fsrfo>>> Subject: Dual booting with Windows XP fsrfo>>> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <4226953C.7080107@gennux.ca> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>>> Hello everyone: fsrfo>>> This might sound rather foolish, but I need some assistance on how to fsrfo>>> dual boot FBSD 5.3 with WinXP. fsrfo>>> I have to Hard Drives, Windows is in the first drive, and I want to fsrfo>>> install FBSD on the second. No in the installation process I choose to fsrfo>>> create the partitions to the second Hard Drive, then it ask me if I want fsrfo>>> to install the boot manager, to which I answer yes, then it ask me where fsrfo>>> to install it, and I choose to the First Hard drive, is that ok? well, fsrfo>>> what happens is that after I choose the installer send me to disklabel fsrfo>>> to slice the Hard drive, but it show the First hard drive. fsrfo>>> am I making any sense at all? I thought that fsrfo>>> installing the boot manager fsrfo>>> was going to be a straigh forward process, is there anything wrong with fsrfo>>> what I am experiencing? Any help will be appreciated. fsrfo>>> Good night everyone fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 25 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:48:19 -0500 fsrfo>>> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022048b90c457@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>>> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with fsrfo>>> the following in make.conf fsrfo>>> CPUTYPE=i686 fsrfo>>> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe fsrfo>>> It was built on a p4. fsrfo>>> I went to install this on my trusty firewall fsrfo>>> machine and I get the following fsrfo>>> error: fsrfo>>> -----BEGIN ERROR----- fsrfo>>> CD Loader 1.2 fsrfo>>> Building the boot loader arguments fsrfo>>> Looking up /BOOT/LOADER... Found fsrfo>>> Relocating the loader and the BTX fsrfo>>> Starting the BTX loader fsrfo>>> BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 fsrfo>>> int=0000000d err=000000c0 efl=00010a47 eip=00015528 fsrfo>>> eax=00000000 ebx=00000001 ecx=ffffffff edx=00094fa0 fsrfo>>> esi=01164e7f edi=c8b66ff7 ebp=00093ff8 esp=7c24ddf4 fsrfo>>> cs=002b ds=0033 es=0033 fs=0033 gs=0033 ss=0033 fsrfo>>> cs:eip=9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 fsrfo>>> 9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 fsrfo>>> ss:esp=ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff fsrfo>>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff fsrfo>>> BTX halted fsrfo>>> -----END ERROR----- fsrfo>>> Also, the 5.3.isos downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org fail to boot as well. fsrfo>>> It's not hardware related as I'm able to pop in a OpenBSD3.6 snapshot fsrfo>>> and boot from that. fsrfo>>> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm going to try the floppies next. fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 26 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:56:57 -0800 fsrfo>>> From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: Crash when PREEMPTION enabled fsrfo>>> To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050303045657.GA6139@xor.obsecurity.org> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" fsrfo>>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:13:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: >>>> I have tried enabling PREEMPTION on 5.3-RELEASE-p5 whilst it ran OK >>>> for a few hours, it crashed overnight whilst doing a "make index" in >>>> /usr/ports. I've tried repeating "make index" and it worked. I have >>>> a coredump of the crash and have been doing some poking around. fsrfo>>> I've just turned on PREEMPTION on the 12-CPU sparc64 machine running fsrfo>>> RELENG_5 that I've been playing with, and it quickly resets and fsrfo>>> reboots under load (buildworld -j12). This happens with either ULE or fsrfo>>> 4BSD, although ULE without PREEMPTION seems to work fine (and perform fsrfo>>> much better than 4BSD, as expected). fsrfo>>> It looks like PREEMPTION is indeed still broken in RELENG_5 - I guess fsrfo>>> my workloads aren't enough to trigger this on other machines :-( fsrfo>>> Kris fsrfo>>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>>> Name: not available fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>>> Desc: not available fsrfo>>> Url : fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050302/d783fa82/attachment-0001.bin fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 27 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:00:22 -0800 fsrfo>>> From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503022100.28784.reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 fsrfo>>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 08:48 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: >>>> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in >>>> make.conf >>>> >>>> CPUTYPE=i686 >>>> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe >>>> >>>> It was built on a p4. fsrfo>>> CFLAGS should be -O2 not -02 and you really may want to concider just -O fsrfo>>> -Mike fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 28 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:09:11 -0500 fsrfo>>> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>>> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022109d8561e2@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>>> I didn't cut and paste that. I had to copy everything by hand. It's fsrfo>>> correct in the make.conf. fsrfo>>> Best, fsrfo>>> Edwin fsrfo>>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:00:22 -0800, Michael C. Shultz fsrfo>>> <reso3w83@verizon.net> wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 08:48 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: >>>> > I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in >>>> > make.conf >>>> > >>>> > CPUTYPE=i686 >>>> > CFLAGS=-02 -pipe >>>> > >>>> > It was built on a p4. >>>> >>>> CFLAGS should be -O2 not -02 and you really may want to concider just -O >>>> >>>> -Mike >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 29 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:15:28 -0500 fsrfo>>> From: Nicholas Basila <mlists@northglobe.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>>> To: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <42269D70.5090806@northglobe.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm fsrfo>>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on fsrfo>>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried fsrfo>>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my fsrfo>>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this fsrfo>>> failure is after the make depend... during the make): fsrfo>>> linking kernel fsrfo>>> if_ndis_pccard.o(.text+0xc): In function `ndis_probe_pccard': fsrfo>>> : undefined reference to `drv_data' fsrfo>>> if_ndis_pci.o(.text+0x14): In function `ndis_probe_pci': fsrfo>>> : undefined reference to `drv_data' fsrfo>>> *** Error code 1 fsrfo>>> Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HP09. fsrfo>>> This card worked fine with 5.3-RELEASE. It's a Broadcom 54G wireless NIC fsrfo>>> on an HP zd7140us notebook. Any thoughts? fsrfo>>> Regards, fsrfo>>> Nicholas fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 30 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:15:03 -0500 fsrfo>>> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022115363d3fde@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>>> It boots OK from the floppies as a work around... fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:48:19 -0500, Edwin Brown fsrfo>>> <edwin.brown@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in make.conf >>>> >>>> CPUTYPE=i686 >>>> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe >>>> >>>> It was built on a p4. >>>> >>>> I went to install this on my trusty firewall machine and I get the following >>>> error: >>>> -----BEGIN ERROR----- >>>> CD Loader 1.2 >>>> >>>> Building the boot loader arguments >>>> Looking up /BOOT/LOADER... Found >>>> Relocating the loader and the BTX >>>> Starting the BTX loader >>>> >>>> BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 >>>> >>>> int=0000000d err=000000c0 efl=00010a47 eip=00015528 >>>> eax=00000000 ebx=00000001 ecx=ffffffff edx=00094fa0 >>>> esi=01164e7f edi=c8b66ff7 ebp=00093ff8 esp=7c24ddf4 >>>> cs=002b ds=0033 es=0033 fs=0033 gs=0033 ss=0033 >>>> cs:eip=9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 >>>> 9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 >>>> ss:esp=ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>>> BTX halted >>>> -----END ERROR----- >>>> Also, the 5.3.isos downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org fail to boot as well. >>>> >>>> It's not hardware related as I'm able to pop in a OpenBSD3.6 snapshot >>>> and boot from that. >>>> >>>> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm going to try the floppies next. >>>> fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 31 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:25:30 -0800 fsrfo>>> From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>>> To: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com>, fsrfo>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503022125.31189.reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 fsrfo>>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 09:09 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: >>>> I didn't cut and paste that. I had to copy everything by hand. It's >>>> correct in the make.conf. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Edwin >>>> fsrfo>>> OK, did you try just using -O? There is a note about that in the fsrfo>>> make.conf file. fsrfo>>> -Mike fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 32 fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:50:41 -0800 fsrfo>>> From: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo>>> FreebBSD 4.10 fsrfo>>> To: Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo>>> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <57d7100005030221505d8ff1b2@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin fsrfo>>> <matrix@itlegion.ru> wrote: >>>> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2) >>>> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ? >>>> >>>> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE >>>> driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure). fsrfo>>> sorry I don't know of any really cheap one's off hand, altho I do have fsrfo>>> experience with 3Ware RAID cards on 4.x. They seemed to work well, fsrfo>>> and they are less expensive than proper SCSI cards...altho slower. If fsrfo>>> cost really an issue would it be worth mirroring your disks in fsrfo>>> software via VINUM? fsrfo>>> -p fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> ~~o0OO0o~~ fsrfo>>> Pete Wright fsrfo>>> www.nycbug.org fsrfo>>> NYC's *BSD User Group fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 33 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:42:33 +1030 fsrfo>>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503031642.39981.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote: >>>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >>>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >>>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >>>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >>>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >>>> failure is after the make depend... during the make): fsrfo>>> How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from? fsrfo>>> etc.. fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo>>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo>>> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo>>> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo>>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo>>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo>>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>>> Name: not available fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>>> Desc: not available fsrfo>>> Url : fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/b6b2f887/attachment-0002.bin fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 34 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:42:33 +1030 fsrfo>>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503031642.39981.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote: >>>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >>>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >>>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >>>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >>>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >>>> failure is after the make depend... during the make): fsrfo>>> How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from? fsrfo>>> etc.. fsrfo>>> -- fsrfo>>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo>>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo>>> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo>>> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo>>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo>>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo>>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>>> Name: not available fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>>> Desc: not available fsrfo>>> Url : fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/b6b2f887/attachment-0003.bin fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 35 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:20:58 -0500 fsrfo>>> From: Nicholas Basila <mlists@northglobe.com> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>>> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <4226ACCA.1020503@northglobe.com> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>>> Daniel O'Connor wrote: >>>>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >>>>>using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >>>>>5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >>>>>rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >>>>>original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >>>>>failure is after the make depend... during the make): >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from? >>>>etc.. >>>> >>>> >>>> fsrfo>>> Well, I've been using the official HP driver. I ran the utility like so: fsrfo>>> ndiscvt -i name_of_nt_driver.inf -s name_of_nt_driver.sys -o fsrfo>>> /tmp/ndis_driver_data.h fsrfo>>> I then copied it to the compile directory of my kernel. Make depend runs fsrfo>>> correctly, but it crashes out during the linking phase of make. I have fsrfo>>> these options at the bottom of my kernel config: fsrfo>>> options NDISAPI fsrfo>>> device ndis fsrfo>>> device wlan fsrfo>>> As I said, this worked perfectly with 5.3 and even 5-current before the fsrfo>>> 5.3 release. I tried building the stable version of ndiscvt, and that fsrfo>>> didn't produce a different header file. I did a cvsup two days ago, got fsrfo>>> the error, and did a new cvsup tonight. fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 36 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:30:44 +0100 (CET) fsrfo>>> From: pcasidy@casidy.com fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>>> To: mlists@northglobe.com fsrfo>>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050303062137.3DFFFB86C@smtp.casidy.net> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>>> On 3 Mar, Nicholas Basila wrote: >>>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >>>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >>>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >>>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >>>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >>>> failure is after the make depend... during the make): >>>> >>>> linking kernel >>>> if_ndis_pccard.o(.text+0xc): In function `ndis_probe_pccard': >>>> : undefined reference to `drv_data' >>>> if_ndis_pci.o(.text+0x14): In function `ndis_probe_pci': >>>> : undefined reference to `drv_data' >>>> *** Error code 1 >>>> >>>> Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HP09. >>>> >>>> >>>> This card worked fine with 5.3-RELEASE. It's a Broadcom 54G wireless NIC >>>> on an HP zd7140us notebook. Any thoughts? fsrfo>>> I had exactly this problem when my fsrfo>>> ndis_driver_data.h was built with a fsrfo>>> previous version of ndiscvt. You may have to update your world too. fsrfo>>> Hope that helps! fsrfo>>> Phil. fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 37 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:32:36 +0100 fsrfo>>> From: Emanuel Strobl <emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> fsrfo>>> Subject: -PRErelease and ACPI: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503030732.41525@harrymail> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" fsrfo>>> Dear Hackers, fsrfo>>> on one remote machine I see the following error fsrfo>>> (RELENG_5 from this night): fsrfo>>> pcib0: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA fsrfo>>> I have only ssh access and putting "-v" in fsrfo>>> /boot.config didn't help me getting fsrfo>>> a verbose dmesg. fsrfo>>> Anyway, I think it's caused by a bogus BIOS but I fsrfo>>> wanted to make sure having fsrfo>>> it reported. fsrfo>>> Last version was RELENG_5 from Nov. 5th and I also had a ACPI error but more fsrfo>>> detailed. Unfortunately I lost the output.... fsrfo>>> Thanks, fsrfo>>> -Harry fsrfo>>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>>> Name: not available fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>>> Desc: not available fsrfo>>> Url : fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/4105ef46/attachment-0001.bin fsrfo>>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>>> Message: 38 fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:27:46 +1030 fsrfo>>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>>> To: Nicholas Basila <mlists@northglobe.com> fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503031727.52538.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:50, Nicholas Basila wrote: >>>> Well, I've been using the official HP driver. I ran the utility like so: fsrfo>>> I don't know where the official HP driver is (hint: a URL would be handy) >>>> ndiscvt -i name_of_nt_driver.inf -s name_of_nt_driver.sys -o >>>> /tmp/ndis_driver_data.h >>>> >>>> I then copied it to the compile directory of my kernel. Make depend runs >>>> correctly, but it crashes out during the linking phase of make. I have >>>> these options at the bottom of my kernel config: >>>> >>>> options NDISAPI >>>> device ndis >>>> device wlan fsrfo>>> I would suggest building it as a module as it's fsrfo>>> much simpler (unless you're fsrfo>>> booting over this interface - which is doubtful) fsrfo>>> eg.. fsrfo>>> cd /usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis fsrfo>>> cp /tmp/foo.inf /tmp/foo.sys . fsrfo>>> ndiscvt -i foo.inf -s foo.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h fsrfo>>> make fsrfo>>> make install >>>> As I said, this worked perfectly with 5.3 and even 5-current before the >>>> 5.3 release. I tried building the stable version of ndiscvt, and that >>>> didn't produce a different header file. I did a cvsup two days ago, got >>>> the error, and did a new cvsup tonight. fsrfo>>> Make sure your userland and kernel are in sync - ie install world to match fsrfo>>> your new kernel. You may be building against stale headers. fsrfo>> В данном сообщении отсутствует тема письма. fsrfo>> Информирую Вас, что подобные сообщения если и будут рассматриваться, fsrfo>> то в последнюю очередь. fsrfo>> Прошу Вас впредь, для ускорения обработки Ваших сообщений указывать их fsrfo>> тему. fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> С уважением, fsrfo>> Пенерджи Р.В. fsrfo>> Начальник отдела ИТ ЗАО Корпорация "СХолдинг" fsrfo>> mailto:prv@s-holding.ru fsrfo>> mailto:prv0@yandex.ru fsrfo>> +7 095 933-8678 fsrfo>> +7 095 933-2811 fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 2 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:13:18 +0300 fsrfo>> From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 fsrfo>> To: "pete wright" <nomadlogic@gmail.com> fsrfo>> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Message-ID: <00b101c51fd1$3fd448f0$0c00a8c0@artem> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; fsrfo>> reply-type=original fsrfo>> pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> >>> wrote: >>>> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2) >>>> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ? >>>> >>>> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB >>>> IDE driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for >>>> sure). >>> >>> sorry I don't know of any really cheap one's off hand, altho I do have >>> experience with 3Ware RAID cards on 4.x. They seemed to work well, >>> and they are less expensive than proper SCSI cards...altho slower. If >>> cost really an issue would it be worth mirroring your disks in >>> software via VINUM? fsrfo>> Well, i don't trust software raids. But 3ware is probably one of the most fsrfo>> expensive raid 0,1 controllers. There must be something around 40$ which fsrfo>> freebsd supports. Does anyone known any model? fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Regards, fsrfo>> Artem Kuchin fsrfo>> IT Legion Ltd. fsrfo>> Moscow, Russia fsrfo>> www.itlegion.ru fsrfo>> matrix@itlegion.ru fsrfo>> +7 095 232-0338 fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 3 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:10:00 +0000 fsrfo>> From: Gerald de la Pascua <geralddelapascua@gmail.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 fsrfo>> To: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> fsrfo>> Cc: Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo>> Message-ID: <1bcf5ef9050303011052f49965@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>> we have had very good experiences with the basic 3ware cards, fsrfo>> I would recommend them, easy to install, reliable, and good perfomance, fsrfo>> in the uk they cost just over 100 pounds, so a similar price to two fsrfo>> disks to plug into them. When a disk fails you would willingly pay fsrfo>> many times this amount, fsrfo>> kind regards, Gerald fsrfo>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:50:41 -0800, pete wright fsrfo>> <nomadlogic@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> wrote: >>> > Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2) >>> > controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ? >>> > >>> > It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE >>> > driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure). >>> >>> sorry I don't know of any really cheap one's off hand, altho I do have >>> experience with 3Ware RAID cards on 4.x. They seemed to work well, >>> and they are less expensive than proper SCSI cards...altho slower. If >>> cost really an issue would it be worth mirroring your disks in >>> software via VINUM? >>> >>> -p >>> >>> -- >>> ~~o0OO0o~~ >>> Pete Wright >>> www.nycbug.org >>> NYC's *BSD User Group >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 4 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:23:56 +0300 fsrfo>> From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 fsrfo>> To: <gerald@homes-on-line.com>, "pete wright" <nomadlogic@gmail.com> fsrfo>> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Message-ID: <00d401c51fd2$bd034af0$0c00a8c0@artem> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; fsrfo>> reply-type=original fsrfo>> Gerald de la Pascua <geralddelapascua@gmail.com> wrote: >>> we have had very good experiences with the basic 3ware cards, >>> I would recommend them, easy to install, reliable, and good >>> perfomance, in the uk they cost just over 100 pounds, so a similar >>> price to two >>> disks to plug into them. When a disk fails you would willingly pay >>> many times this amount, fsrfo>> 3ware controllers are one of the most expensive ones. I am sure there fsrfo>> are good controllers which cost a lot less and work with freebsd. Do fsrfo>> you know any? fsrfo>> Artem fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 5 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:18:23 +0900 (JST) fsrfo>> From: Yoshiaki Kasahara <kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> fsrfo>> Subject: 1000baseTX? fsrfo>> To: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: fsrfo>> <20050303.181823.216808984.kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> fsrfo>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>> Hello, fsrfo>> In man pages, dmesg and ifconfig of FreeBSD5, GbE operation over fsrfo>> twisted pair is mostly referred as '1000baseTX'. I guess most of them fsrfo>> should be replaced by '1000baseT'. 1000base"TX" and 1000base"T" are fsrfo>> different standard and they are not compatible ("TX" needs CAT6 cable fsrfo>> and uses pairs in different way). Also 1000baseTX support is very fsrfo>> rare yet. I'm sorry I'm not sure if some devices really support "TX". fsrfo>> For example, I have a NIC based on Realtek RTL8169S and its manual fsrfo>> says "It supports 1000BASE-T/100BASE-TX/10BASE-T". fsrfo>> In dmesg: fsrfo>> rgephy0: <RTL8169S/8110S media interface> on miibus1 fsrfo>> rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, fsrfo>> 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto fsrfo>> Regards, fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Yoshiaki Kasahara fsrfo>> kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 6 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:04:30 +0000 fsrfo>> From: Jake Stride <nsuk@users.sourceforge.net> fsrfo>> Subject: Linking with CUPS Issue fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <4226E12E.7000209@users.sourceforge.net> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>> I have had a look on google and the archives and although I have seen fsrfo>> people with a similar issue I have not been able to find an answer to fsrfo>> the issue I have. fsrfo>> I am trying to compile the magicolor 2430DL printer dirvers and keep fsrfo>> running into the following error: fsrfo>> root@lancelot# make fsrfo>> Linking rastertokmlf... fsrfo>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcups fsrfo>> *** Error code 1 fsrfo>> Stop in /root/magicolor2430DL-1.1.0. fsrfo>> Now I have the following cups packages installed (I am using 5.3), what fsrfo>> am I doing wrong? fsrfo>> Thanks fsrfo>> Jake fsrfo>> root@lancelot# pkg_info | grep cups fsrfo>> cups-1.1.23.0 The Common UNIX Printing System: Metaport to install fsrfo>> comple fsrfo>> cups-base-1.1.23.0_3 The Common UNIX Printing System: headers, libs, & fsrfo>> daemons fsrfo>> cups-lpr-1.1.23.0 The CUPS BSD and system V compatibility binaries fsrfo>> (lp* comma fsrfo>> cups-pstoraster-7.07_3 GNU Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to fsrfo>> non-PS prin fsrfo>> gnome-cups-manager-0.28,1 Admistration tool for cups fsrfo>> libgnomecups-0.1.14,1 Support library for gnome cups admistration fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 7 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:09:55 +0100 fsrfo>> From: Jared Earle <jearle@gmail.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Dual booting with Windows XP fsrfo>> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Message-ID: <5bbc0cd6050303020977bbf94e@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:40:28 -0700, Didier Caamano fsrfo>> <nemesisdivina@gennux.ca> wrote: >>> Hello everyone: >>> >>> This might sound rather foolish, but I need some assistance on how to >>> dual boot FBSD 5.3 with WinXP. >>> >>> I have to Hard Drives, Windows is in the first drive, and I want to >>> install FBSD on the second. No in the installation process I choose to >>> create the partitions to the second Hard Drive, then it ask me if I want >>> to install the boot manager, to which I answer yes, then it ask me where >>> to install it, and I choose to the First Hard drive, is that ok? well, >>> what happens is that after I choose the installer send me to disklabel >>> to slice the Hard drive, but it show the First hard drive. >>> >>> am I making any sense at all? I thought that installing the boot manager >>> was going to be a straigh forward process, is there anything wrong with >>> what I am experiencing? Any help will be appreciated. fsrfo>> If you want Windows on the first drive, then I recommend letting the fsrfo>> Windows boot manager handle it. fsrfo>> The handbook page on it is here, but it seems to be missing the fact fsrfo>> that you can find the boot file (/boot/boot1) on the install CD. fsrfo>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#NT-BOOTLOADER fsrfo>> Here's my tiny howto for fedora with a freebsd addendum: fsrfo>> http://www.ramblingwaffles.net/DualBoot fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Jared Earle :: http://www.23x.net fsrfo>> jearle@gmail.com :: There is no SPORK fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 8 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:18:13 -0600 fsrfo>> From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Need Help With mount_smbfs Error Message fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <4226E465.5050709@tundraware.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed fsrfo>> I am running 4.11-stable (sources up-to-date as of today). I have fsrfo>> a smb file system mounted on this machine (it is a samba share on another fsrfo>> 4.11-stable box). I am seeing this message intermittently: fsrfo>> smb_maperror:Unmapped error 1:158 fsrfo>> What might be causing this? fsrfo>> TIA, fsrfo> В данном сообщении отсутствует тема письма. fsrfo> Информирую Вас, что подобные сообщения если и будут рассматриваться, fsrfo> то в последнюю очередь. fsrfo> Прошу Вас впредь, для ускорения обработки Ваших сообщений указывать их fsrfo> тему. fsrfo> -- fsrfo> С уважением, fsrfo> Пенерджи Р.В. fsrfo> Начальник отдела ИТ ЗАО Корпорация "СХолдинг" fsrfo> mailto:prv@s-holding.ru fsrfo> mailto:prv0@yandex.ru fsrfo> +7 095 933-8678 fsrfo> +7 095 933-2811 fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 2 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:29:04 +0100 fsrfo> From: Roberto Nunnari <roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch> fsrfo> Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: can't get a crash dump fsrfo> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <4226F500.6070406@supsi.ch> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed fsrfo> Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:52:00PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: >> >> >>>hehe.. talked to early.. just had another crash.. and as usual >>>it didn't dump, and it didn't enter ddb.. it just reset! >> >> >> OK, now that we've established that it's not actually panicking, the >> overwhelmingly most likely cause of 'spontaneous reset' crashes is bad >> hardware. e.g. your power supply may be marginal and unable to hold >> up to peak loads, so your system will lose power and reboot when you >> exceed that load. >> >> Kris fsrfo> Ok. The problem seams to be solved.. it was a hardware problem. fsrfo> Thank you! fsrfo> Best regards. fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Roberto Nunnari -software engineer- fsrfo> mailto:roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch fsrfo> Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana fsrfo> Dipartimento Tecnologie Innovative fsrfo> http://www.dti.supsi.ch fsrfo> SUPSI-DTI fsrfo> Via Cantonale tel: +41-91-6108561 fsrfo> 6928 Manno """ fax: +41-91-6108570 fsrfo> Switzerland (o o) fsrfo> =======================oOO==(_)==OOo======================== fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 3 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:57:53 +0000 fsrfo> From: Jake Stride <jake.stride@senokian.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: Linking with CUPS Issue fsrfo> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <4226FBC1.9030105@senokian.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo> Michael C. Shultz wrote: >>try ls -l /usr/local/lib/libcups* >>to see if the libraries are in place >>if not install: >>/usr/ports/print/cups-base >>if they are try: >>ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib/ >> >>-Mike >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> fsrfo> Still no luck: fsrfo> ls -l /usr/local/lib/libcups* fsrfo> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 159842 Jan 28 16:04 /usr/local/lib/libcups.a fsrfo> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Jan 28 16:04 /usr/local/lib/libcups.so ->> libcups.so.2 fsrfo> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 124828 Jan 28 16:04 /usr/local/lib/libcups.so.2 fsrfo> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 102092 Jan 28 16:04 fsrfo> /usr/local/lib/libcupsimage.a fsrfo> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 Jan 28 16:04 fsrfo> /usr/local/lib/libcupsimage.so -> libcupsimage.so.2 fsrfo> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 79770 Jan 28 16:04 fsrfo> /usr/local/lib/libcupsimage.so.2 fsrfo> root@lancelot# ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib fsrfo> root@lancelot# make fsrfo> Linking rastertokmlf... fsrfo> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcups fsrfo> *** Error code 1 fsrfo> Stop in /root/magicolor2430DL-1.1.0. fsrfo> Thanks fsrfo> Jake В данном сообщении отсутствует тема письма. Информирую Вас, что подобные сообщения если и будут рассматриваться, то в последнюю очередь. Прошу Вас впредь, для ускорения обработки Ваших сообщений указывать их тему. -- С уважением, Пенерджи Р.В. Начальник отдела ИТ ЗАО Корпорация "СХолдинг" mailto:prv@s-holding.ru mailto:prv0@yandex.ru +7 095 933-8678 +7 095 933-2811
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1698330100.20050303151433>