Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:43:59 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: still more on pointing to relnotes Message-ID: <200111051943.fA5Jhxk10328@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> In-Reply-To: <20011105143006.A91718@blackhelicopters.org> References: <20011105143006.A91718@blackhelicopters.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] If memory serves me right, Michael Lucas wrote: > It also seems that it would be still better to have a separate entity > for the hardware notes, as well as the release notes. Here's a patch > that implements that, and corrects the pointer to pointer to info. I was going to suggest that, but you beat me to it. Although I haven't looked through the FAQ/Handbook to see how many places these entities would get used (and thus how much we win), I can't see any *harm* in doing this, and it seems like a pretty good idea to me. > Okay, I'll shut up now... :-) Cheers, Bruce. PS. I don't know how often we need to refer to the errata file, but that's another candidate for entitification. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE75uv/2MoxcVugUsMRAt6kAJsHo6yjNtVhmDiqJ/+pBgCYAyiCtwCfWi8q 11D6kGZ//UFRPQFKoIe9Ek8= =895L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111051943.fA5Jhxk10328>