Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:17:23 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkgbase@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 259785] pkgbase installation order is underspecified Message-ID: <bug-259785-36141-DTASgT3xfx@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-259785-36141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-259785-36141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D259785 --- Comment #4 from Gleb Popov <arrowd@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #3) > That would help, but it's possible that pkgbase packages will have some p= ost-install scripts that rely on other packages. I believe this is an extremely rare situation in Ports and if it happens th= en it is post-install scripts that should be fixed. By delaying the execution = via triggers, for example. Anyways, I don't know much about pkgbase, why do pkgbase packages have post-install scripts at all? > IMO the right answer is that some packages must be marked such that the s= olver does not split the upgrade job for them. Hmm, pkg performs that splitting because it has to. We can't just disable i= t, otherwise there would be no splits at all. If a file belonging to one packa= ges is moved to an another on during the upgrade, but the dependence is the oth= er way around, we have to split and it can't be avoided. Or am I missing something? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-259785-36141-DTASgT3xfx>