Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:16:04 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux-ePSXe Makefile Message-ID: <20040217091604.GA12283@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040217033721.K36419@blues.jpj.net> References: <200402162335.i1GNZq5H081683@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040217033721.K36419@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:03:17AM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: > > kris 2004/02/16 15:35:52 PST > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > emulators/linux-ePSXe Makefile > > Log: > > BROKEN: Inconsistent dependencies (linux_base 7.x and 8.x). This por= t is > > scheduled for removal on April 16 if it is still broken at that time. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.4 +3 -0 ports/emulators/linux-ePSXe/Makefile > > > > <URL:http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/emulators/linux-ePSXe/= Makefile.diff?&r1=3D1.3&r2=3D1.4&f=3Du> >=20 > From > <URL:http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-4-latest/linux-epsxe-1.6.0.l= og> > it looks like the problem is that bento is doing a pkg_add of a linux-gtk > package which has a dependency on linux_base 7.1. In my experience, the > linux-gtk port works fine with either linux_base 7.1 or linux_base 8.0. > I marked the linux_base 8.0 port RESTRICTED, so most users won't be > installing it from a package. I think that really very few users would > suffer from this problem. A solution would be to include the GTK+ library > in the linux_base 7.1 port/package, like I did with linux_base 6.1. That > was unpopular. The default linux_base package is currently still 7.1, so maybe linux-gtk should default to depend on that. We can't make 8.0 the default linux_base as long as it's restricted anyway (think CD installs). > If this port is removed, the problem will still remain. There are other > ports, and unported software, that are affected. Maybe > MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD would be a decent workaround. I'm less happy with that workaround..there should be a way to solve this properly. Kris --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAMdvUWry0BWjoQKURAkDYAKDZH45ubWyX3SQs+1sqb3kQJ34glgCcCGE3 a7751Qzo7A2wF6LBE8ITYEw= =1PTy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040217091604.GA12283>