Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:35:49 -0700 From: Bill Swingle <unfurl@dub.net> To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: [unfurl@dub.net: Re: advocacy site] Message-ID: <19990804133549.B90687@dub.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 03:29:37PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Bill Swingle wrote: > > > These are exactly the issues that need to be resolved. The idea of a > > database back end for the content is nice but is it really necessary? If > > we can for go the DB backend, integration with the existing site would > > be much easier. I think that solving this one issue would make the others > > quite a bit more addressable :) > > True, however, with a website that should be very dynamic, do you want to > see 500(well, not that many) commits a day to an advocacy tree? true, but I am having a hard time remembering what parts of the site nreally need to be all that dynamic. Certainly a lot of the site could easily be static, with thigns such as PR's and news as exceptions. Or I may be smoking from the wrong end of the pipe again. Who knows. -Bill -- -=| Bill Swingle - unfurl@dub.net - unfurl@freebsd.org - bill@cdrom.com -=| "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers" Pablo Picasso To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990804133549.B90687>