Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:07:45 +0100 From: Rolf Nielsen <listreader@lazlarlyricon.com> To: Reko Turja <reko.turja@liukuma.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any chance ZFS becoming default? Message-ID: <4B2D3291.1010404@lazlarlyricon.com> In-Reply-To: <E7A4C254FF8D4B1AAB27E63078A83F3B@rivendell> References: <6c51dbb10912190642s43ec0f2bj69047a0d5a0690ae@mail.gmail.com> <200912192018.59607.oloringr@gmail.com> <E7A4C254FF8D4B1AAB27E63078A83F3B@rivendell>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Reko Turja wrote: >> under Other Kernel: >> ZFS as default > > So anyone running 32bit or under 2Gb of memory don't need to bother with > FreeBSD anymore after 9.0 RELEASE? Since when does changing the default action imply making the previous default impossible or even difficult? And since when does adding an ability to a piece of software imply removing another? I can't find anything suggesting that support for UFS is to be removed by 9.0. Neither from the kernel or from sysinstall.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B2D3291.1010404>