Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:51:59 +0100 From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@free.fr> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: VIMAGE: Freed UMA keg was not empty Message-ID: <201101141851.59565.thierry.herbelot@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <20110114124738.F14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <201011170627.28025.thierry.herbelot@free.fr> <201011182304.06712.thierry.herbelot@free.fr> <20110114124738.F14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> a =E9crit > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> a =E9crit > >=20 > >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > >>> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> a =E9crit > >>>=20 > >>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > >>>>> As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment) > >>>>>=20 > >>>>> This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers > >>>>> the bug on a debug kernel and ensuing DDB session. > >>>>>=20 > >>>>> the obvious problem line is : > >>>>> routetbl 2684 303890K 3469 > >>>>>=20 > >>>>> (further tests showed an increase of the routetbl malloc zone by > >>>>> 4MBytes for each vnet jail creation/destruction cycle) > >>>>=20 > >>>> Hmm, I had fixed that (somewhere). I'll see where the patch went. Y= ou > >>>> are on 8.1-RELEASE or -STABLE? > >>>=20 > >>> This will be for a -release, thus 8.1 for now, but we will switch to > >>> 8.2 ASAP > >>=20 > >> Well wait; I am not sure the changes are in SVN at all. I'll get back > >> to you. > >=20 > > OK for us : we are still in the process of deploying the solution, but > > still we will test any patch you can forward ;-) >=20 > Do you have FLOWTABLE enabled in your kernel config? Hello, I will check at work on monday, but I think so, as the kernel configuration= =20 was derived from GENERIC. BTW, the setup we wanted (ie with VIMAGE) is showing good stability (with 8= =2E2- stable) as we have removed the need to start and stop the jails. we will=20 definitely deploy 8.2 with VIMAGE and use it for our test bench. TfH >=20 > /bz
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201101141851.59565.thierry.herbelot>