Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:51:59 +0100
From:      Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@free.fr>
To:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD virtualization mailing list <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: VIMAGE: Freed UMA keg was not empty
Message-ID:  <201101141851.59565.thierry.herbelot@free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20110114124738.F14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
References:  <201011170627.28025.thierry.herbelot@free.fr> <201011182304.06712.thierry.herbelot@free.fr> <20110114124738.F14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> a écrit
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> a écrit
> > 
> >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> >>> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> a écrit
> >>> 
> >>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> >>>>> As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment)
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers
> >>>>> the bug on a debug kernel and ensuing DDB session.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> the obvious problem line is :
> >>>>>          routetbl         2684       303890K         3469
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> (further tests showed an increase of the routetbl malloc zone by
> >>>>> 4MBytes for each vnet jail creation/destruction cycle)
> >>>> 
> >>>> Hmm, I had fixed that (somewhere).  I'll see where the patch went. You
> >>>> are on 8.1-RELEASE or -STABLE?
> >>> 
> >>> This will be for a -release, thus 8.1 for now, but we will switch to
> >>> 8.2 ASAP
> >> 
> >> Well wait; I am not sure the changes are in SVN at all.  I'll get back
> >> to you.
> > 
> > OK for us : we are still in the process of deploying the solution, but
> > still we will test any patch you can forward ;-)
> 
> Do you have FLOWTABLE enabled in your kernel config?

Hello,

I will check at work on monday, but I think so, as the kernel configuration 
was derived from GENERIC.

BTW, the setup we wanted (ie with VIMAGE) is showing good stability (with 8.2-
stable) as we have removed the need to start and stop the jails. we will 
definitely deploy 8.2 with VIMAGE and use it for our test bench.

	TfH

> 
> /bz



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201101141851.59565.thierry.herbelot>