Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 20:56:05 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tag will go down at 20:30 PDT Message-ID: <199810160356.UAA01755@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <10908.908503889@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* I've moved it up a half hour to give a few folks just a bit more time,
* but that's when it will be. I'll be turning commits off (how do we do
* that again? :) around this time and flipping them back on after the
* tag is completed.
Don't turn Justin off, he's still workin' on the ports tree. I'm
going to lay down the tag ("cvs rtag TAG ports", right?) when I see
his commit to ports/INDEX.
* Again, I will *not* be tagging the ports tree in
* order to give those folks a bit more time. It's also not critical
* (for me) that ports be tagged since the release builds have never used
* tags in extracting ports. Even if I tagged ports now, any subsequent
* builds I did after sliding various tags on src forward would simply
* grab the -current ports tree and the tag would be essentially ignored.
* It's only for reference purposes, I guess. Never did understand the
* logic of tagging the ports tree (with a completely different tag, no
* less) anyway. :-)
No problem, it just means the ports tree will have to remain frozen a
little longer until you finally come up with a concoction that makes
your grandma proud!
* In any case, just FYI!
Satoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810160356.UAA01755>