Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 04:18:17 -0700 From: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> To: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG, Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> Subject: Re: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready Message-ID: <20020711111817.GA8289@gnuppy.monkey.org> In-Reply-To: <1026385676.781.30.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de> References: <20020710234814.GE2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15660.64672.311655.234760@emerger.yogotech.com> <1026385676.781.30.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:07:55PM +0200, Marc Recht wrote: > Am Do, 2002-07-11 um 05.33 schrieb Nate Williams: > > If the only problems are userland (ie; libc_r), that's a really silly > > reason to abandon -stable for -current. > IMHO is targeting -current The Right Thing (tm). 5.0-RELEASE is not _so_ > far away and it would be nice if it would come with a native (Sun I see both sides to this issue. The working premise here is that -current is my prefered platform of choice for pure HotSpot development. If that fails to serve my purposes then I'll think about moving to -stable. BTW, I was multiplying the os::sleep() values by 1000x, which made the Java2D demo slow. ;) I fixed that and it runs more reasonably now with only a 3.8x slow down from the native Linux JVM on my Debian box. That's probably because I'm running a debug version of HotSpot. I expect it to be faster (I got a glimpse of it) with the production version. The signs are definitely encouraging. I need to quit this project and move onto something that's more mainstream for my career, so I might drop it anyways. I'm getting low on cash here. :\ I'll keep you folks informed. bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020711111817.GA8289>