Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:37:03 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: threads/150889: PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER + pthread_mutex_destroy () == EINVAL Message-ID: <201009241937.05173.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100924172735.6b3910d1@kan.dnsalias.net> References: <201009232220.o8NMK3fX011639@freefall.freebsd.org> <201009241711.16129.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20100924172735.6b3910d1@kan.dnsalias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 24 September 2010 05:27 pm, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > If we were to break PTHREAD ABI, we should go all the way and > make necessary changed to make process-shared locks possible. > All IMHO. I agree. Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201009241937.05173.jkim>