Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:08:01 -0500 From: Hiten Pandya <hiten@unixdaemons.com> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ACPI: working ACPI vs broken ACPI Message-ID: <20030216170801.GA86500@unixdaemons.com> In-Reply-To: <20030215202651.D36608@patrocles.silby.com> References: <20030215113219.J57358@cvs.imp.ch> <20030215202651.D36608@patrocles.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:27:45PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote the words in effect of: > > On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 > > to GPE31 > > Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block1 defined as GPE32 > > to GPE63 > > I see similar errors on my Presario 2100US... > > > Wild guess: Seem to result from this. If I'm looking at NetBSD's > > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/acpi/acpi_ec.c they > > have a lot done since they took acpi from us. I'm sure it works > > for netbsd. > > > > Is anybody working on this ? > > > > Martin > > I've been trying to load that URL since yesterday, but it's not working > from here. Can you elaborate on what it does? Try the following URL: - http://cvsweb.no.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/acpi/acpi_ec.c Cheers. -- Hiten Pandya (hiten@unixdaemons.com, hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org) http://www.unixdaemons.com/~hiten/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030216170801.GA86500>