Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:18:39 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: daichi@jp.freebsd.org, java@freebsd.org, Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com> Subject: Re: Building java/jdk16 and jdk15 inside FreeBSD jail Message-ID: <499EBBBF.2050105@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <499E4C02.7050004@icyb.net.ua> References: <20090202.165004.71135074.chat95@mac.com> <4987AF4F.7050301@jp.freebsd.org> <4988414C.8060806@icyb.net.ua> <20090220.141648.143710352.chat95@mac.com> <499E4C02.7050004@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 20/02/2009 07:16 Maho NAKATA said the following: >> Hm, Andriy, nullfs on ZFS might work? >> Still my environment is UFS2, so I'll try when I switched to ZFS... >> thanks > > My understanding is that nullfs should work even better with UFS, so I > am guessing that your problem might not be caused nullfs. From my opinion, I am doubting that read-write unionfs works stably and correctly even on heavy situations. JIMO, current implementation of nullfs essentially has unstable seen while heavy read-write situations. If you want to use nullfs, read-only mode is better even for heavy situation :) Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?499EBBBF.2050105>