Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 12:55:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com> To: Joe Mays - freebsd-isp <fbsd-isp@launchpad.win.net> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Apache Virtual Website options Message-ID: <Pine.UW2.3.95.960728125024.8972C-100000@cedb> In-Reply-To: <AC18@launchpad.win.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 28 Jul 1996, Joe Mays - freebsd-isp wrote: > Does anyone have any input on which method offers more performance > when you get into the 200-300 virtual website realm? I don't have any hard performance numbers for you but consider that using the bind option with 200 virtual hosts will require (with default settings) 1000 httpds running at all times. Using the VirtualHost option, you'll only have as many as you really need running at any one time. Now that may turn out to be just as many but at least they are guaranteed to be doing real work, not just eating memory. Dan -- Dan Busarow 714 443 4172 DPC Systems dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.UW2.3.95.960728125024.8972C-100000>