Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 23:43:52 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>, Patrick Greenwell <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Firewall config non-intuitiveness Message-ID: <15443.41384.226640.462561@caddis.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20020125190552.E14394@blossom.cjclark.org> References: <20020124201411.A39351-100000@rockstar.stealthgeeks.net> <20020124220302.N87663@blossom.cjclark.org> <002b01c1a5a7$67200e00$3028680a@tgt.com> <20020125160846.A14394@blossom.cjclark.org> <000c01c1a5ff$a4539870$0101a8c0@cascade> <20020125190552.E14394@blossom.cjclark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> But there may be people running systems out there with > 'firewall_enable="NO"' and compiled-in firewalls. This is a straw-man. This requires kernel changes, and anyone willing to do kernel changes just to install different firewall rules deserves to get the rug yanked out from under them. > Because I can't think of a workable configuration that would be set up > this way, it doesn't mean there are not any. There aren't any systems in useful use that would be effected by this change. If you don't get around to it, I might. :) :) :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15443.41384.226640.462561>