Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 01:27:52 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Heads-up: Kernel module symbol resolution changing Message-ID: <20250401012752.22e5a1312c1f363544b40a57@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2Ck3TowKZYpn0COkM6MMKuqFcdfzHx9Zd_PAJJrex99ZQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPyFy2C3PVx-85e4-9s%2Brn0e9OQNaJKoeaquTVipb2YyOH7-uw@mail.gmail.com> <20250315120317.e6b2512e8d37e7f51d1aab03@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <CAPyFy2Ck3TowKZYpn0COkM6MMKuqFcdfzHx9Zd_PAJJrex99ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:57:45 -0400 Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 at 23:03, Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 13:07:58 -0400 > > Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > Our in-kernel module linker currently performs symbol resolution > > > against local symbols from other modules, which is a bug. > > > > > Hi. > > Is this planned only for main (aka 15-Current)? Or any plan to MFC? > > Right now I plan to do it only in main. The current behaviour is > undesired, but I strongly prefer to avoid changes like this in stable > branches that could surprise users. Thanks for the clarification. And yes, POLA violations on stable and releng branches should be avoided, unless it is mandated to address workaround-less security vulnerabilities. Regards. -- Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20250401012752.22e5a1312c1f363544b40a57>