Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:46:16 +0000 From: Bradley Kite <bradley@deathsgate.demon.co.uk> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Reiserfs on Freebsd Message-ID: <20020301224616.A12630@deathsgate.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20020301223106.GN77980@elvis.mu.org>; from bright@mu.org on Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:31:06PM -0800 References: <20020301221306.A12425@deathsgate.demon.co.uk> <20020301223106.GN77980@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The reason is convenience (dont want to have to reboot every time I need that 2k file in Linux) - you may well ask why FreeBSD supports NTFS + FAT > Why? Softupdates does a better job than logging does. :) [snip] > Your assumptions are correct however your belief that it's a simple > task may be a mistake. :) And also it will teach me a lot about both Linux + FreeBSD kernel internals -- Brad To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020301224616.A12630>