Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:46:16 +0000
From:      Bradley Kite <bradley@deathsgate.demon.co.uk>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Cc:        reiserfs-list@namesys.com, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Reiserfs on Freebsd
Message-ID:  <20020301224616.A12630@deathsgate.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20020301223106.GN77980@elvis.mu.org>; from bright@mu.org on Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:31:06PM -0800
References:  <20020301221306.A12425@deathsgate.demon.co.uk> <20020301223106.GN77980@elvis.mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The reason is convenience (dont want to have to reboot every time I need
that 2k file in Linux) - you may well ask why FreeBSD supports NTFS + FAT

> Why?  Softupdates does a better job than logging does. :)
[snip] 
> Your assumptions are correct however your belief that it's a simple
> task may be a mistake. :)
 
And also it will teach me a lot about both Linux + FreeBSD kernel internals

--
Brad

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020301224616.A12630>