Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:58:01 +0100 From: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@FreeBSD.org>, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, marino@freebsd.org, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r361646 - in head/net/samba36: . files Message-ID: <53C668C9.9030209@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140716115304.GA5861@FreeBSD.org> References: <53C322A7.2090705@marino.st> <20140714003112.GA54756@mouf.net> <CALdFvJEvf4-RSJNUVxX08T8K-tq9PoKge-XxmhDafAn_QxjEcg@mail.gmail.com> <53C451FA.2020304@marino.st> <20140715170501.GA73101@FreeBSD.org> <53C5618F.2020104@FreeBSD.org> <20140716094453.GA53961@FreeBSD.org> <53C65677.8060603@FreeBSD.org> <20140716111328.GB82901@FreeBSD.org> <53C6638E.6000801@FreeBSD.org> <20140716115304.GA5861@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16/07/14 12:53, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:35:42PM +0100, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: >> On 16/07/14 12:13, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>> I don't see why it cannot work the old way, just as described in PHB >>> section 5.2.2.1. <skipped> >> that was lie over all the history of the ports. Indeed, if we define >> something like 'bump revision if something is wrong with a port' then we >> are in trouble, as different maintainers have different viewpoints about >> what is wrong and what is not. Hence, if you have more constructive >> suggestions than to throw out pkg I would appreciate to hear them. > > Can you elaborate more on why we are in trouble if I don't bump revisions > on typo fixes, mastersite updates or adding of LICENSE knob? What is the > breakage scenario here (for pkg users)? Again, I have no objections about licenses/comments/whatever. I want actually merely to figure out, which manifest's fields are *significant*. At this point, I can easily change this list without insulting users. On the contrary, after 1.3 release that would be hard. I suggest thus to stop bikescheding and switch to constructive discussion and define how should we distinguish one package from another. And no, we *cannot* rely on port version/revision/epoch only! -- Vsevolod Stakhov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53C668C9.9030209>