Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:36:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: switching threading libraries Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604071434070.20876@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <4436ACA3.3000507@elischer.org> References: <slrne3ck4t.18h.csaba@beastie.creo.hu> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0604070910310.15406-100000@sea.ntplx.net> <20060407140809.GZ1323@beastie.creo.hu> <4436ACA3.3000507@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Julian Elischer wrote: > Csaba Henk wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:10:56AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> >>> Only between libthr and libpthread. libc_r doesn't have symbol >>> versioning. >>> >> >> That's sad -- given, as noted elsewhere, libc_r is the best suitable >> for tracing. >> >> Will it remain like this or can we expect a symver'd libc_r >> in due time? >> >> Regards, >> Csaba >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > Dan, maybe we can make an option where libc_r degrades down to one kse > somehow > then it would probable be more traceable. You mean like: $ sudo sysctl kern.threads.virtual_cpu=1 and, or $ LIBPTHREAD_PROCESS_SCOPE=yes; export LIBPTHREAD_PROCESS_SCOPE ?? -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0604071434070.20876>