Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:18:14 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports and PBIs Message-ID: <4BC0B2D6.7030500@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4BC088D3.3010908@incunabulum.net> References: <4BBFD502.1010507@elischer.org> <4BC088D3.3010908@incunabulum.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/10/10 7:18 AM, Bruce Simpson wrote: > On 04/10/10 02:31, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some >> others and I, felt that these ideas seemed to make some sense >> and so I put them here for comment. > > Please do. Someone has to do something about deployment. > > For what it's worth, I've tripped over the garden rake on the ground, > that is 'unsatisfied dependency' one too many times in commercial work. > > If PBIs can address this, even for FreeBSD's embedded and server use > cases, they will likely be well recieved. though the embedded people would be EXACTLY the people who would NOT use this new feature. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BC0B2D6.7030500>