Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:52:36 +0100 From: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-lists@klop.ws> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS and ISCSI Message-ID: <op.w8cd5yj9kndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local> In-Reply-To: <20131219124451.GA71702@anubis.morrow.me.uk> References: <52B1C42A.4020506@LaTech.edu> <op.w8ap0zzd8527sy@212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl> <52B1CDB8.8050400@LaTech.edu> <op.w8ayo71t8527sy@212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl> <52B1FEAB.20008@LaTech.edu> <20131219124451.GA71702@anubis.morrow.me.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:44:56 +0100, Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> wrote: > Quoth "Ronald Klop" <ronald-lists@klop.ws>: >> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:59:39 +0100, Danny Schales <dan@latech.edu> >> wrote: >> > On 12/18/13 01:20 PM, Ronald Klop wrote: >> > >> >> Maybe asking for the obvious, but... >> >> Do your zfs volumes have mountpoint set? >> > >> > yes, mountpoint is set. >> >> You might also post more information about your setup. Like the >> partitioning of your iscsi 'disks' (I don't have much experience with >> that). And the actual values of things like your mountpoint and iscsi >> config files. > > None of this information makes any difference: Danny's original analysis > of the problem is correct. Any zpools which show up after /etc/rc.d/zfs > has run will not be automatically mounted, they must be explicitly > mounted with 'zfs mount -a'. This is expected behaviour, and how things > are supposed to work, but noone had previously realised that iSCSI disks > (and, presumably, any other networked block devices) necessarily fall > into this category. The solution is a ZFS equivalent to > /etc/rc.d/mountlate; I believe all it needs to contain is 'zfs mount > -a', but ICBW. > > Ben Ok Regards, Ronald.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.w8cd5yj9kndu52>