Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 16:06:30 +0200 From: "Kristof Provost" <kp@FreeBSD.org> To: "John-Mark Gurney" <jmg@funkthat.com> Cc: "Gleb Smirnoff" <glebius@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r336221 - head/sys/net Message-ID: <A9633492-FF32-461D-B8D7-F0686ECD339A@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20180805020249.GL2884@funkthat.com> References: <201807121635.w6CGZZAN046919@repo.freebsd.org> <20180803230405.GI420@FreeBSD.org> <25795E0A-A362-44B2-AC5A-573442FC256D@FreeBSD.org> <20180805020249.GL2884@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5 Aug 2018, at 4:02, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Also, I don't know the hash used, but another option is to use a > non-power of 2 hash... > I remember seeing patches someone experimented with a new hash algorithm, but I can’t seem to find it anywhere right now. I believe the patch was abandoned, perhaps because of disappointing results. > Increasing the memory required on smaller systems and not making sure > it's documented how to save that memory is a bad idea... > The relevant tuneables are documented in the pf(4) man page. Regards, Kristof
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A9633492-FF32-461D-B8D7-F0686ECD339A>