Date: Fri, 26 May 1995 18:59:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com> To: "Alok K. Dhir" <adhir@iagi.net> Cc: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "mb_map full" ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950526185651.786A-100000@haven.uniserve.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950526125613.11002A-100000@bigdipper.iagi.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 May 1995, Alok K. Dhir wrote: > #for News servers > options "CHILD_MAX=128" > options "OPEN_MAX=128" > options "NMBCLUSTERS=512" > > And someone also mailed me a patch for INN which apparently seals up a > memory leak problem. > > I did all four things (applied patch and added above lines) and the > machine seems much more stable now. > > I am mailing because I am wondering whether you can offer advice as to > either additional kernel options I may need to optimize this machine's > uptime, or values for the above options which may be more appropriate. INN on FreeBSD seems to be susceptible to the select-loop bug in INN (innd starts using 100% CPU time). You may want to install that patch. The ports team may want to consider this patch as a standard FreeBSD patch for INN. Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.950526185651.786A-100000>