Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:34:40 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: dfff37765ce4 - main - Rename struct device to struct _device Message-ID: <0d350998-cf6a-7493-d204-eddf81246ab2@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <202104121430.13CEUUIq030729@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <202104121336.13CDaI5A029079@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <202104121430.13CEUUIq030729@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On 4/12/21 4:30 PM, Cy Schubert wrote: > Whereas freebsd_device or fbsd_device is more > descriptive and gives the struct the status it deserves There are other non-FreeBSD OS'es using this structure too. I think freebsd_device is too specific. How about bsd_device? In this world of cross OS compatibility I see a point not being too generic when naming structures. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0d350998-cf6a-7493-d204-eddf81246ab2>