Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:23:39 +1000 (EST) From: jason andrade <jason@rtfmconsult.com> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: freebsd 4.9 alpha ports link points into i386 tree ? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221318530.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> In-Reply-To: <20040122031108.GB9102@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221124120.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> <20040122014706.GA46878@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221231130.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> <20040122023736.GA47498@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221239110.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> <20040122031108.GB9102@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Ken Smith wrote: > When compared to the sizes of everything else in the FTP site doing > this might not be the best idea because it breaks being able to > carry one specific architecture if the architecture you choose > isn't the one with the "real" ports file. It does save us a little > space but... unless by default you make the i386 architecture the one with the actual ports tree and you carry the i386 architecture. are there any official mirrors that don't carry at least i386 in addition to any others ? i'm not trying to create any extra work here - just trying to figure out how to get things consistent.. or perhaps i am suffering from obsessive compulsive behaviour after all.. and while we're at it.. there were a few other questions about some other directories... regards, -jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221318530.4689-100000>