Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 16:56:53 -0500 (EST) From: Charlie ROOT <root@freebsd.org> To: Anthony Hill <ahill@interconnect.com.au> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: consequences of `bpfilter' pseudo-device Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960119165454.26663C-100000@Aspen.Woc.Atinc.COM> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960119225519.20104B-100000@tulpi.interconnect.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Jan 1996, Anthony Hill wrote: > # The `bpfilter' pseudo-device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. Be > # aware of the legal and administrative consequences of enabling this > # option. > > May I ask, what are the legal and administrative consequences of enabling > bpfilter ? that depends upon where you do it, if they know, if they catch you, and maybe even if you care. ;) this is not a technical issue. its a human interaction issue. i am still looking for a really good reference manual. jmb Jonathan M. Bresler FreeBSD Postmaster jmb@FreeBSD.ORG play go. ride bike. hack FreeBSD.--ah the good life i am moving to a new job. PLEASE USE: jmb@FreeBSD.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960119165454.26663C-100000>