Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:15:40 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-arm description? Message-ID: <D5A63161-BBC3-4BF7-8634-3EF0C5EE6A4C@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: <op.w65hzxm58527sy@ronaldradial.radialsg.local> References: <D8D11C17-21CE-4F90-BC6E-7991BC6B21F2@freebsd.org> <7DCF72F0-4072-46DD-A3F7-F33FC10055E9@neville-neil.com> <1385414670.1220.21.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <41B13191-0D41-4EA8-BBCE-3E6A440EF90A@neville-neil.com> <47088196-D4BE-4490-A4DA-C4EF6D4A27F3@bsdimp.com> <op.w65hzxm58527sy@ronaldradial.radialsg.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I=92ll follow-up with postmaster to make the change. Thanks for the suggested edits. Tim On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Ronald Klop <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> = wrote: > On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:26:02 +0100, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> = wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:28 PM, George Neville-Neil wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 16:24 , Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:07 -0500, George Neville-Neil wrote: >>>>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 16:05 , Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> = wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> According to this page: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> =93[This mailing list] is for individuals actively working on >>>>>> porting FreeBSD to the StrongArm Processor.=94 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> How do we change that to something a bit more accurate? >>>>>> (I=B4ve recently heard from someone who passed over >>>>>> this mailing list because they didn=B4t think it applied to >>>>>> more modern ARM processors.) >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Maybe: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> =93This is a technical mailing list for people working to >>>>>> develop and support FreeBSD on various ARM >>>>>> processors and SOCs.=94 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> +postmaster@ >>>>>=20 >>>>> I think they can do this. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Best, >>>>> George >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> It might be better to say "systems" or "computers" in place of = SOCs. >>>> Our focus historically has been on the chip/SoC, but increasingly = ARM >>>> processors are finding their way into off-the-shelf retail = computers. >>>=20 >>> I think if we leave off =93and SOCs=94 we=92ll run the correct = gamut. >>=20 >> You might want to toss 'modern' in front of the processors, since we = mostly talk about that here, with the odd question about legacy things = that have gotten broken. But I'm easy. >>=20 >> Warner >=20 > Drop the point that it is a list for people. It is about 'running = FreeBSD on ARM processors' AFAIK. >=20 > Ronald. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D5A63161-BBC3-4BF7-8634-3EF0C5EE6A4C>