Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:54:11 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" <nikolas.britton@gmail.com> To: "Garrett Cooper" <youshi10@u.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? Message-ID: <ef10de9a0701092054h157a93a1s8f054e12cb6f91a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <ef10de9a0701091508k7f1775f7h4c2cdc8c7498e7fc@mail.gmail.com> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/9/07, Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Don't know about some of the items, but... > -Flash support with Mozilla products is being done through Mozilla's > ActionScript Engine: > <http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200611/110706Mozilla.html>. > So, I expect the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player to be supported > on all Unix platforms to some extent in the future. Sound support will > be interesting though. But I use Opera?? And It needs to work with youtube, without crashing and without install headaches. 'cd /usr/ports/www/flash; make install clean; exit;' then open browser to youtube.com and go. No library shuffle or libmap configuring. > -Isn't Xen handled by the Xen project and not FreeBSD? Yes, and they have done their part. Now it's FreeBSD's turn to integrate the changes needed to the kernel into the kernel to make Dom0 support work. Linux has it, Solaris has it. NetBSD has it. Mac has it? FreeBSD does not have it. Server virtualization is the next big thing and FreeBSD has nothing going for it in this respect... Not even VMware or any of the other big players works with FreeBSD as a host OS. > Seems like your comment (was related) but off-topic. It is off-topic... don't really care at this point.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef10de9a0701092054h157a93a1s8f054e12cb6f91a>