Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:51:39 +0900 From: gnn@FreeBSD.org To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet6 in6.h in6_proto.c route6.c Message-ID: <m2lkghp6fo.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <20070424174324.GA1011@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <20070424155910.266924509A@ptavv.es.net> <200704241847.13056.max@love2party.net> <20070424174324.GA1011@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:43:25 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > > Can you "MTC" this so we can turn off and on RH0 processing on current > > > systems? It would greatly simplify things for me if I didn't have to > > > build two kernels and move back and forth to test things. > > > > +1 ... also is this going to be in the supported RELENG_X_Y branches as > > well? > > Yes, once the foodwork required is done. You'll still have to build two kernels, it is just off by default completely in HEAD. The IETF is currently discussing retiring the option in which case the code will disappear completely from HEAD. Do you really think the option is required in HEAD? Best, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2lkghp6fo.wl%gnn>