Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:49:24 +0000 From: Matt Smith <matt@xtaz.net> To: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> Cc: Quincey Koziol <koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: Aligning GENERIC with NOTES? Message-ID: <4032A884.80006@xtaz.net> In-Reply-To: <p0600200ebc58333220ea@[172.29.253.253]> References: <200402162041.i1GKfV4s056904@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> <xzpznbiyc4z.fsf@dwp.des.no> <p06002004bc56f22c9401@[172.29.253.253]> <200402171938.i1HJckEA005628@dee.skynet.be> <p0600200ebc58333220ea@[172.29.253.253]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brad Knowles wrote: > If you don't want anything to change, then tracking -CURRENT is a > really bad idea. Personally I run -current and have done for the last year. However I have NEVER used NOTES or LINT in my life. I have configured my custom kernels just by cp GENERIC BLAH, and then editing BLAH. I have no idea what the order of NOTES etc is. But if I ever found GENERIC have changed from what I expect it to be I would be annoyed as I know and love the current GENERIC layout. I can see where you are coming from if you DID use NOTES etc however please bear a thought for the people like me who have gone 100% from GENERIC ever since they have used freebsd. Personally I have used fbsd since 3.x and GENERIC has not changed much since. I'm used to it! Matt.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4032A884.80006>