Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:07:28 +0900 From: Takanori Watanabe <takawata@init-main.com> To: andrew.grover@intel.com Cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff? Message-ID: <200303210207.h2L27SKG020546@sana.init-main.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:41:28 PST." <F760B14C9561B941B89469F59BA3A84725A211@orsmsx401.jf.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <F760B14C9561B941B89469F59BA3A84725A211@orsmsx401.jf.intel.com>, "Gr over, Andrew" wrote: >> From: Nate Lawson [mailto:nate@root.org] >> http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acp>; >i/downloads/CHANGES.txt >> >> I'll try to generate a diff soon at post it since I haven't heard from >> iwasaki@ Iwasaki seems to be busy now. > >This is against the Linuxized version but you should be able to get the >gist of it: > >--- 2421-pre4-acpi/drivers/acpi/events/evgpeblk.c.orig Wed Mar 5 >17:00:15 2003 >+++ 2421-pre4-acpi/drivers/acpi/events/evgpeblk.c Wed Mar 5 >17:01:30 2003 >@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ > /* Ensure that we have a valid GPE number for this GPE block */ > > if ((gpe_number < gpe_block->block_base_number) || >- (gpe_number >= (gpe_block->register_count * 8))) { >+ (gpe_number - gpe_block->block_base_number >= >(gpe_block->register_count * 8))) { > Thanks. I'll apply it. BTW. I noticed that some definition for structure is added and its naming collide to our OS-dependent module. We has been avoided it by using non-linuxlized ACPI-CA that has the naming rule of beggining with 'Acpi' not 'acpi_'. Would you care about it next time? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200303210207.h2L27SKG020546>