Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 17:42:03 +0200 From: Jos Backus <Jos.Backus@nl.origin-it.com> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Berkeley DB 1.85 --> 2.0 Message-ID: <19990514174203.A35400@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> In-Reply-To: <19990514192123.A42749@nagual.pp.ru>; from Andrey A. Chernov on Fri, May 14, 1999 at 07:21:23PM %2B0400 References: <19990513164720.A26399@trinsec.com> <373C3E17.66362795@loverso.southborough.ma.us> <19990514192123.A42749@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 07:21:23PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> Not so easily, it conflict with libc's DB in subtle but harmful manner.
Talking about upgrades: people on the mutt-dev list say our (outdated) ncurses
is to blame for not dealing properly with SIGWINCH. Newer versions (4.2 at
least) are said to get it right. Would installing the ncurses port be able to
cause similar problems? Just wondering...
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Reliability means never
_/ _/ _/ having to say you're sorry."
_/ _/_/_/ -- D. J. Bernstein
_/ _/ _/ _/
Jos.Backus@nl.origin-it.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990514174203.A35400>