Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:31:01 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: rivers@dignus.com Cc: mark@grondar.org Subject: Re: NULL vs 0 vs 0L bikeshed time Message-ID: <20040301.233101.81684205.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200403011315.i21DFvC95798@lakes.dignus.com> References: <200402291546.i1TFkZ0w070591@grimreaper.grondar.org> <200403011315.i21DFvC95798@lakes.dignus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200403011315.i21DFvC95798@lakes.dignus.com>
Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> writes:
: But - I believe (and I need to check on this) that the C++
: standard requires the NULL constant to be a pointer type (so
: various conversions work.)
C++ needs it to be a 0, not a pointer.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040301.233101.81684205.imp>