Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:10:25 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap metadata is correctly signed, but contains at least one line which appears bogus. Message-ID: <20100423001025.3138d003@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <h2ga0777e081004220932x8d44a02ch3c68612b1360a5bd@mail.gmail.com> References: <h2ga0777e081004220932x8d44a02ch3c68612b1360a5bd@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:32:23 +0300 Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been getting the following message a lot lately. > > Portsnap metadata is correctly signed, but contains > at least one line which appears bogus. > > I've used the following command in the past to fix the error but it > didn't work this time. > find /var/db/portsnap/ -newerct "1 day ago" -delete If the metadata is correctly signed then it sounds like it should be a server-side problem. OTOH no-one else is mentioning it, are you running portsnap from a reasonably recent release? It might be instructive to edit portsnap, look for the places where fetch_metadata_freakout is called and have it make a copy of the offending file.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100423001025.3138d003>