Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:10:50 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
To:        Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [rfc] replacing /boot/kernel.old with a unique directory name
Message-ID:  <22EB0C13-A184-446F-A031-A2817CB3BE7D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110813195127.GA34295@freebsd.org>
References:  <20110813195127.GA34295@freebsd.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> wrote:

> hi there,
> 
> i just had the following idea: how about instead of copying the current kernel
> to /boot/kernel.old and then installing the new one under /boot/kernel as the
> results of target installkernel, we create a unique directory name for the old
> kernel?
> 
> something like /boot/kernel-r${revision}-${/dev/random}?
> 
> that would let people not only boot the previous kernel, but all kernels that
> have been replaced by target installkernel. this would make tracking issues,
> which have been introduced by a certain commit much easier, imho.
> 
> i don't think implementing this logic would be that difficult. the only problem
> i see is with ${/dev/random} in the case where people are running a kernel
> without /dev/{u}random support.

Why not just use INSTKERNNAME?
-Garrett

help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22EB0C13-A184-446F-A031-A2817CB3BE7D>