Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 08:05:23 -0800 From: Thomas Stephens <tas@stephens.org> To: Jim Pirzyk <Jim.Pirzyk@disney.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Thomas Stephens <tas@stephens.org> Subject: Re: ksh93? Message-ID: <199902171605.QAA24351@stephens.ml.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Feb 1999 10:08:02 EST." <99021710091400.35933@amigo.faf.fa.disney.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jim Pirzyk wrote: >On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Thomas Stephens wrote: >>Jim Pirzyk wrote: >>>I have been using the BSDI version for a long time now (2 - 3 years) >>>and I have not had any problems with it. I would be interested in >>>a native FreeBSD version and how much faster it would run. >>> >>>pirzyk@amigo:~ >>>1>file /bin/ksh >>>/bin/ksh: BSD/OS i386 compact demand paged executable not stripped >> >>Thanks for the info! Is the BSDI ksh part of BSD/OS (i.e. is a BSD/OS >>licence necessary to use it)? One other thing: do you know which >>version it is (93 or 88)? > >No, I downloaded the BSDI ksh from att and it follows their license. > >http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/reuse/packages/ksh93.html > >Yes it is ksh93. Oops, thanks for clearing that up! I didn't realise the BSD/OS port was currently available. Of course, a FreeBSD port would be better still. Thomas Stephens tas@stephens.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902171605.QAA24351>