Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:04:44 -0700
From:      Dan Vande More <dvm@firstlink.com>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: transparent squid bridge
Message-ID:  <1079114684.1240.22.camel@dvmgentoo>
In-Reply-To: <20040312100054.A63349@xorpc.icir.org>
References:  <1079113870.1238.8.camel@dvmgentoo> <20040312100054.A63349@xorpc.icir.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I did try it manually, several times. My question in that scenario, is:

Will it still work with:

src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c,v 1.51.2.1 2003/12/23 12:25:56 maxim

and

src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c,v 1.259 2003/11/26 20:31:13 andre

When I did apply it manually, it *seemed* like it didn't work. I admit
it could have easily been user error. 

Thanks!

Dan

On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 11:00, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:51:10AM -0700, Dan Vande More wrote:
> > Hey all
> 
> how about applying the patch manually ? It is so trivial
> it would have taken less than posting this message...
> 
> cheers
> luigi
> 
> > Trying to get freebsd to do some simple redirecting using ipfw2.
> > 
> > Luigi Rizzo's patch isn't working.
> > 
> > http://www.freebsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?threadid=14795
> > 
> > Applying the patch yields:
> > 
> > ********************************************************
> > Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text leading up to this was:
> > --------------------------
> > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c,v
> > |retrieving revision 1.6.2.16
> > |diff -u -r1.6.2.16 ip_fw2.c
> > |--- ip_fw2.c 17 Jul 2003 06:03:39 -0000 1.6.2.16
> > |+++ ip_fw2.c 22 Sep 2003 22:21:38 -0000
> > --------------------------
> > Patching file ip_fw2.c using Plan A...
> > patch: **** malformed patch at line 7: goto done;
> > *********************************************************
> > 
> > Is this ever going to make it's way into the main source code?
> > Does any one have a working patch for this, the full file or an
> > alternative setup?
> > 
> > It doesn't matter which version of freebsd I have to run, I just need a
> > version.
> > 
> > All I really want is a box, with 2 network cards.
> > This box sits between users and the outgoing router acting as a bridge.
> > The box sees all outbound port 80 connections, diverts them to squid
> > running on itself. 
> > Squid retrieves the site, caches the data, etc.
> > 
> > I can do it with openbsd/pf but openbsd in and of itself can't handle
> > much of a load.
> > Using the same rules in freebsd pf that I do in openbsd, can I expect it
> > to work?
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Dan Vande More
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1079114684.1240.22.camel>