Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 01:33:53 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Results of BIND RFC Message-ID: <20100402013353.f544e8ad.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <m2eiiymfa2.wl%randy@psg.com> References: <4BB51B5B.1050606@FreeBSD.org> <20100401222404.77a14a02.stas@FreeBSD.org> <m2eiiymfa2.wl%randy@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:26:13 +0900 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> mentioned: > > i don't mind if dig, doc, et alia are not in base, as long as they are a > separate port from the bind hippo. > The major benefit of having them in the base is the ability to cross-compile them when building the distribution for another platform. Ports doesn't support cross-compilation yet, and it would be a pity to find yourself bootstrapping another tiny arm platform and having to use ports to have a usable system. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100402013353.f544e8ad.stas>