Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:38:27 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 195098] pthread lock performance degradation on single CPU VM in FreeBSD 10.0
Message-ID:  <bug-195098-16-9wBQoa652w@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-195098-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-195098-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195098

Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|New                         |Closed
         Resolution|---                         |Unable to Reproduce
            Summary|pthread lock performance    |pthread lock performance
                   |degradation on single CPU   |degradation on single CPU
                   |VM                          |VM in FreeBSD 10.0

--- Comment #4 from Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> ---
In comment 2 I missed including in the reproduction detail that this was the
10.0-REL VM. When I mentioned this kib@ pointed out that this is fixed already
in r270423, and is included in the FreeBSD 10.1 release.

> Restore pre-r239157 handling of sched_yield(), when thread time slice was
> aborted, allowing other threads to run.  Without this change thread is just
> rescheduled again, that was illustrated by provided test tool.


HEAD: r270423
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&amp;revision=270423

stable/10: r271194
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=271194

stable/9: r271195
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=271195

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-195098-16-9wBQoa652w>