Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:45:47 -0500 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: "R. Imura" <imura@af.airnet.ne.jp> Cc: will@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/kdelibs11 Makefile ports/x11/kdelibs11/pkg DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <20000323094547.H422@argon.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <20000323210027Z.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp>; from imura@af.airnet.ne.jp on Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 09:00:27PM %2B0900 References: <200003230254.SAA02336@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000323210027Z.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 09:00:27PM +0900, R. Imura wrote: > Don't forget that every k* ports check kdelibs' existence with kdecore.la > by configure. Actually, I've been pondering this a little. Satoshi, perhaps a simple symlink from libkdecore.la to libkdecore.so would be better for this? I am not sure if it would conflict with libtool though, but patching one port is definitely better than patching 50+ ports (IMO). Thoughts? (I'll do it either way, but I need advice on this before I commit any further re kdelibs.. my preference would go to symlinking libkdecore.la). -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000323094547.H422>