Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 23:37:10 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/portlint Makefile Message-ID: <20060407043710.GA27402@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <1144384388.23833.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200604070008.k370815D002659@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060407042854.GB27150@soaustin.net> <1144384388.23833.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:33:08AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > I thought we were waiting for Ade's libtool patch was was already > committed. I have seen numerous PRs about REINPLACE since then as well > as many relevant commits. Therefore, I saw no problem in doing > portlint. The idea I had was to do the USE_REINPLACE things as a small number of commits sweeping the entire tree, rather than N commits. I would think the commits are OK if you are already committing a PR anyway. I would also like to see as many of the 'update'-style PRs committed before we do that sweep, because after that the patches in many of those PRs are probably going to become stale. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060407043710.GA27402>