Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:22:44 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) Message-ID: <496A7F44.3060503@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <342292.89033.qm@web32703.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <61484.71762.qm@web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20090111044448.GC5661@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <342292.89033.qm@web32703.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> There was, however, the idea that the installation could be more
> packaged oriented.
Yes, this idea is perpetual, in large part because no one has stepped
up to do the work. So don't talk about it, just do it. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?496A7F44.3060503>