Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 08:43:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220927] www/py-requests: Latest net/py-urllib3 update breaks version requirements, causing py-certbot / py-salt to fail to run Message-ID: <bug-220927-21822-ZOB1AyOEdM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-220927-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-220927-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220927 --- Comment #21 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #18) I don't mind that method and it has the same issues with multiple patch-files patching common files, patch ordering, etc so no real trade-off is obvious. The intent of my comment requirements is that patches are documented and referenced (to the extent that they can be), and reported upstream (where they can be) and so that our future selves don't need to waste time hunting for the 'why' behind the what. Both methods (comment in patch) or PATCHFILES is approved as long as the existing patches/comments are maintained and the patches are tested -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-220927-21822-ZOB1AyOEdM>