Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 00:44:05 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Kai Wang <kaiw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r261246 - in head: . cddl/contrib/opensolaris/tools/ctf/cvt contrib/elftoolchain lib/libdwarf lib/libelf sys/sys Message-ID: <20140201234405.GO54904@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <201401282138.s0SLcsVV085769@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201401282138.s0SLcsVV085769@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Pk/CTwBz1VvfPIDp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:38:54PM +0000, Kai Wang wrote: > Author: kaiw > Date: Tue Jan 28 21:38:54 2014 > New Revision: 261246 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/261246 >=20 > Log: > Merge from projects/elftoolchain: Upgrade libelf and libdwarf to newer > versions from elftoolchain upstream (r2974). Convert ctfconvert to > use the APIs from the new libdwarf and make ctfconvert work with Clang > 3.4. > =20 > __FreeBSD_version is bumped to 1100006. > =20 Thanks for this update, I just want to remind something to everyone, becaus= e it happened a lot recently. Before breaking any ABI (SHLIB num bumped here in this case) all committers should first talk to portmgr sync with them and then commit (and send a hea= sup to portmgr saying the commit has been done) Why so? just because we are trying to provide packages for head, that means= that before the commit we need to know it will happen and we have time available= to upgrade the build jail for head, then once we know we would be able handle = the upgrade of the jail in a good timeframe, then the heads up mail allows us to know that the upgrade should actually be done (svn up will get the modifica= tion) So next rebuild of packages will be done from scratch instead of incrementa= l. We are putting a lot of effort in trying to get packages working for head, = this small 2 mails will save us a lot of time, and a lot of stress. regards, Bapt I think we should really mark this has a policy in the committer handbook. --Pk/CTwBz1VvfPIDp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlLthsUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew4gACeJX7Cz8+/8NAz0zGdvftMhsqp IcYAn1WNDb+HADaiH0IvmpulVzJuef1+ =2536 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pk/CTwBz1VvfPIDp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140201234405.GO54904>